[Internal-cg] consensus building

[Kavouss Arasteh]

version 5 still does not cover many iof my points
Pls read the file as attached to my previous mail
Regards
KAVOUSS



2014-09-03 12:31 GMT+02:00 Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in>:

> v5 is attached. I would send the dropbox link but I’m having dropbox
> connectivity problems.
>
> On 9/3/14, 1:28 PM, "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Friend
> I do not know what is in version 5
> Pls look at the attached doc.
> KAVOUSS
>
>
> 2014-09-03 12:23 GMT+02:00 Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in>:
>
>> On 9/3/14, 1:10 PM, "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I do not know what we are dealing here
>>
>>
>> I was commenting on v5 circulated by Wolf-Ulrich. That version has text
>> in it that I find problematic, as indicated in my email. The v4 version you
>> circulated does not contain that language. As I will not be present on Sept
>> 6, I’m trying to get my comments to the mailing list in advance of the
>> meeting.
>>
>> Alissa
>>
>> Please kindly read my doc on consensus building sent to you last night
>> Vrsion 4
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-09-03 10:28 GMT+02:00 Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in>:
>>
>>> Wolf-Ulrich,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your work on this.
>>>
>>> On 9/2/14, 1:19 AM, "WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >* “small minority”: should further be discussed. I added
>>> >  the condition that a recommendation is not reached if at least one of
>>> >the ICG
>>> >  communities (according to the list) as a whole is firmly and formally
>>> >opposed.
>>> >  That would mean a formal written objection by the community leadership
>>> >on
>>> >  behalf of their community.
>>> >
>>>
>>> I’m not sure this matches what was being discussed on the list. If we use
>>> the text Martin had suggested, I think the third bullet under section
>>> 4(b)
>>> should read:
>>>
>>> "After enough time has passed for the ICG to consider and attempt to
>>> accommodate objections, the ICG can reach a conclusion if at most a small
>>> minority disagrees and their objections have been documented.  It is not
>>> expected that the representatives of an operational community
>>> significantly and directly affected by a conclusion would be overruled in
>>> this process.”
>>>
>>> Alissa
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>> Internal-cg at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140903/5e6a741c/attachment.html>