[Internal-cg] consensus building

Martin Boyle Martin.Boyle at nominet.org.uk
Wed Sep 3 21:08:08 UTC 2014

Thank you Alissa:  this reflects my concerns well.  I note that we did this discussion entirely by e-mail, so I can understand how Wolf-Ulrich missed it.

I have a couple of other comments - all are in the marked-up draft attached and placed in drop-box.



-----Original Message-----
From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Alissa Cooper
Sent: 03 September 2014 11:29
To: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben; internal-cg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] consensus building


Thanks for your work on this.

On 9/2/14, 1:19 AM, "WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de> wrote:
>* “small minority”: should further be discussed. I added
>  the condition that a recommendation is not reached if at least one of 
>the ICG
>  communities (according to the list) as a whole is firmly and formally 
>  That would mean a formal written objection by the community 
>leadership on
>  behalf of their community.

I’m not sure this matches what was being discussed on the list. If we use the text Martin had suggested, I think the third bullet under section 4(b) should read:

"After enough time has passed for the ICG to consider and attempt to accommodate objections, the ICG can reach a conclusion if at most a small minority disagrees and their objections have been documented.  It is not expected that the representatives of an operational community significantly and directly affected by a conclusion would be overruled in this process.”


Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ICG-Consensus Building_draft_v5 + MB.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 82432 bytes
Desc: ICG-Consensus Building_draft_v5 + MB.doc
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140903/d85642f3/ICG-ConsensusBuilding_draft_v5MB.doc>

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list