[Internal-cg] Posting of draft RFP
narelle.clark at accan.org.au
Fri Sep 5 09:41:10 UTC 2014
I understood this was going out for comment. Saying it is 'subject to change' is not the same as 'does your community consider this form of words will adequately capture the input you need to give?'.
It's an RFC on the RFP.
Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net> wrote:
On 5.09.14 9:01 , Patrik Fältström wrote:
> As you have noticed ICANN posted an announcement as a result of a request to have the draft RFP posted, for transparency reasons. I am working with ICANN on coming up with issues that makes this clear.
On my own initiative I have just sent the following to
ianatransition at icann.org where I saw the announcement:
"Be aware that this text has not been formally agreed by the ICG yet. It
is a very very stable draft, but changes may still occur before it is
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at icann.org
More information about the Internal-cg