[Internal-cg] Fwd: Possible ICG-GAC meeting in Los Angeles

Milton L Mueller mueller at syr.edu
Fri Sep 5 12:49:26 UTC 2014


Of these meetings, I think you MUST do GNSO and ccNSO  and the others are of secondary importance. 
Although ALAC wil participate and GAC may participate in proposal development processes, the core of the Cross Community working group is in GNSO and ccNSO. So if you want to guide and encourage and push them into action, that is the place to be. 

--MM

> -----Original Message-----
> From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org]
> On Behalf Of Lynn St.Amour
> Sent: Friday, September 5, 2014 8:15 AM
> To: Narelle Clark
> Cc: internal-cg at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Fwd: Possible ICG-GAC meeting in Los Angeles
> 
> Hi Narelle,
> 
> Good question.  I neglected to mention in my earlier email that we also asked
> the same thing of the ALAC chair - Olivier Crepin-Leblond and he also was
> favorable.
> 
> Perhaps we could prepare a fuller list -  GNSO or ccNSO ??
> 
> Lynn
> 
> 
> On Sep 5, 2014, at 7:56 AM, Narelle Clark <narelle.clark at accan.org.au> wrote:
> 
> >  I agree. An ICG-GAC meeting would be very helpful. Even if the agenda is only
> a meet and greet session, with hopefully time to hear key concerns/hopes for
> our undertaking.
> >
> > Hopefully close to our meeting.
> >
> > Could this be firmed up as soon as possible so that we can finalise travel?
> >
> > Might there be any other important stakeholders that we could consider or
> even arrange to meet as well?
> >
> >
> > Narelle
> >
> >  Mary Uduma <mnuduma at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Good move Lynn for ICG to have meeting with GAC in LA.  Wednesday looks
> better than Sunday and we may propose 1hr for the meeting.
> >
> > Mary Uduma
> >
> >
> > On Friday, September 5, 2014 12:49 PM, Joseph Alhadeff
> <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Should be ok, can we confirm as soon as posdible?
> >
> > Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > From: Kavouss Arasteh [kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com]
> > Received: Friday, 05 Sep 2014, 12:20PM
> > To: Lynn St.Amour [Lynn at lstamour.org]
> > CC: Internal-cg at icann.org [internal-cg at icann.org]
> > Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Fwd: Possible ICG-GAC meeting in Los
> > Angeles
> >
> > Dear All,
> > It is a good idea
> > Kavouss
> >
> >
> > 2014-09-05 11:16 GMT+02:00 Lynn St.Amour <Lynn at lstamour.org>:
> >
> > > Dear colleagues,
> > >
> > > in a conversation earlier this week, Alissa and I suggested that the
> > > ICG might meet with the GAC at the ICANN LA meeting.  The purpose
> > > would be general engagement/exchange of progress/discuss concerns,
> > > etc.  The agenda would be determined at a later point, but if we are
> > > to meet with them we need to reserve a slot.
> > >
> > > We received the following note from them and would like to gauge the
> > > ICG's interest in meeting, and to know whether Wednesday would work
> > > as a possible time?
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Lynn
> > >
> > >
> > > Begin forwarded message:
> > >
> > > *From: *Tom Dale <tom at acig.com.au>
> > > *Subject: **Possible ICG-GAC meeting in Los Angeles*
> > > *Date: *September 3, 2014 9:45:51 PM EDT
> > > *To: *"Lynn at Internet-Matters.org" <Lynn at Internet-Matters.org>
> > > *Cc: *"alissa at cooperw.in" <alissa at cooperw.in>,
> > > "heather.dryden at ic.gc.ca Dryden" <Heather.Dryden at ic.gc.ca>, Olof
> > > Nordling <olof.nordling at icann.org>, "Julia Charvolen"
> > > <julia.charvolen at icann.org>, Michelle Scott Tucker <
> > > michelle at acig.com.au>
> > >
> > >  Hello Lynn
> > >
> > >  Heather Dryden has asked me to contact you concerning a possible
> > > meeting between GAC and the ICG in Los Angeles.
> > >
> > >  Do you have an idea of how long you think is needed?
> > >
> > >  While the GAC agenda is not yet finalised, there will be a session
> > > on IANA Stewardship Transition and ICANN Accountability on the
> > > Sunday from
> > > 1030 to 1230 that would probably be the best fit. However, I
> > > understand that not all ICG members may be in Los Angeles so early
> > > in the ICANN meeting. Late Wednesday morning is another possibility.
> > > Please let me know if any times (not just the ones I have suggested)
> > > are particularly good or problematic for you.
> > >
> > >  You asked for a list of current GAC members. This can be found on
> > > the GAC website at
> > > https://gacweb.icann.org/display/gacweb/GAC+Representatives
> > >
> > >  Regards
> > >
> > >
> > >      Tom Dale
> > >  ACIG GAC Secretariat
> > >
> > >  ACIG - Australian Continuous Improvement Group  evaluate :: improve
> > > :: innovate
> > >
> > >  Cell:      + 61 418 207 376
> > >  tom at acig.com.au <michelle at acig.com.au>  www.acig.com.au
> > >
> > >  ACIG is an independent consulting firm engaged to provide
> > > secretariat support to ICANN's Governmental Advisory Committee.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Internal-cg mailing list
> > > Internal-cg at icann.org
> > > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Internal-cg mailing list
> > Internal-cg at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg



More information about the Internal-cg mailing list