[Internal-cg] Fwd: Possible ICG-GAC meeting in Los Angeles
James M. Bladel
jbladel at godaddy.com
Fri Sep 5 14:44:19 UTC 2014
An interesting question, Wolf. And does this mean that the GAC (and/or ALAC) will -not- be participating in the Cross-Community effort of the "Names" community?
If they are, then why the separate meeting?
From: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>>
Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>>
Date: Friday, September 5, 2014 at 9:26
To: "Lynn St.Amour" <Lynn at lstamour.org<mailto:Lynn at lstamour.org>>, ICG List <internal-cg at icann.org<mailto:internal-cg at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Fwd: Possible ICG-GAC meeting in Los Angeles
I'm having here a basic questionmark.
What can be done at such a meeting different from exchanging status information? This lies in the remit of the reps of the various communities.
The GAC is one of the "communities" being represented on the ICG - on equal footing like 12 other communities.
If there are GAC-specific questions or questions related to other communities these questions should be filed in advance to a potential meeting. I wouldn't like to see communities being treated in different way.
From: Lynn St.Amour<mailto:Lynn at lstamour.org>
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 12:16 PM
To: Internal-cg at icann.org<mailto:internal-cg at icann.org>
Subject: [Internal-cg] Fwd: Possible ICG-GAC meeting in Los Angeles
in a conversation earlier this week, Alissa and I suggested that the ICG might meet with the GAC at the ICANN LA meeting. The purpose would be general engagement/exchange of progress/discuss concerns, etc. The agenda would be determined at a later point, but if we are to meet with them we need to reserve a slot.
We received the following note from them and would like to gauge the ICG's interest in meeting, and to know whether Wednesday would work as a possible time?
Begin forwarded message:
From: Tom Dale <tom at acig.com.au<mailto:tom at acig.com.au>>
Subject: Possible ICG-GAC meeting in Los Angeles
Date: September 3, 2014 9:45:51 PM EDT
To: "Lynn at Internet-Matters.org<mailto:Lynn at Internet-Matters.org>" <Lynn at Internet-Matters.org<mailto:Lynn at Internet-Matters.org>>
Cc: "alissa at cooperw.in<mailto:alissa at cooperw.in>" <alissa at cooperw.in<mailto:alissa at cooperw.in>>, "heather.dryden at ic.gc.ca<mailto:heather.dryden at ic.gc.ca> Dryden" <Heather.Dryden at ic.gc.ca<mailto:Heather.Dryden at ic.gc.ca>>, Olof Nordling <olof.nordling at icann.org<mailto:olof.nordling at icann.org>>, "Julia Charvolen" <julia.charvolen at icann.org<mailto:julia.charvolen at icann.org>>, Michelle Scott Tucker <michelle at acig.com.au<mailto:michelle at acig.com.au>>
Heather Dryden has asked me to contact you concerning a possible meeting between GAC and the ICG in Los Angeles.
Do you have an idea of how long you think is needed?
While the GAC agenda is not yet finalised, there will be a session on IANA Stewardship Transition and ICANN Accountability on the Sunday from 1030 to 1230 that would probably be the best fit. However, I understand that not all ICG members may be in Los Angeles so early in the ICANN meeting. Late Wednesday morning is another possibility. Please let me know if any times (not just the ones I have suggested) are particularly good or problematic for you.
You asked for a list of current GAC members. This can be found on the GAC website at https://gacweb.icann.org/display/gacweb/GAC+Representatives
ACIG GAC Secretariat
ACIG - Australian Continuous Improvement Group
evaluate :: improve :: innovate
Cell: + 61 418 207 376
tom at acig.com.au<mailto:michelle at acig.com.au>
ACIG is an independent consulting firm engaged to provide secretariat support to ICANN's Governmental Advisory Committee.
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at icann.org<mailto:Internal-cg at icann.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Internal-cg