[Internal-cg] consensus building

Patrik Fältström paf at frobbit.se
Sat Sep 6 06:43:26 UTC 2014


I have added this to the dropbox.

   Patrik

On 6 sep 2014, at 09:35, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry that the attachment was missing
> Here it is again
> Kavouss
> 
> 
> 2014-09-06 7:33 GMT+02:00 Joseph Alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com>:
> Jari
> 
> Just to note that it's best to discuss a process solution before a controversy emerges so I think that time spent now is advisable...
> 
> Joe
> 
> Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> From: Martin Boyle [Martin.Boyle at nominet.org.uk]
> Received: Saturday, 06 Sep 2014, 12:35AM
> To: Jari Arkko [jari.arkko at piuha.net]; WUKnoben [wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de]
> CC: Coordination Group [internal-cg at icann.org]
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] consensus building
> 
> I think that this is very sensible, Jari.  I still think it will be worth noting "... a *small* minority disagree..."
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jari Arkko
> Sent: 05 September 2014 17:20
> To: WUKnoben
> Cc: Coordination Group
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] consensus building
> 
> I think the dedicated voting thresholds make the process too rigid and formal. I think the explanation of making an attempt to reach consensus or at the very least having only a minority disagree is sufficient. At the end of the day, rather than pure numbers the actual situation has to be taken into account and a decision has to be made.
> 
> My meta comment is also that we're spending a lot of time in designing the process for the controversial situations, when it is quite obvious that if we fail to reach broad consensus on the proposal the NTIA will in any case observe that their requirements have not been fulfilled.
> 
> (I do believe we will likely get _some_ controversy no matter how perfect the solution will be. But it is a different thing to have a couple of extreme opinions vs. significant parts of the communities having a problem.)
> 
> Jari
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
> 
> <ICG Guidelines for the Decision Making-rev1 06 Sept ka.docx>_______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140906/be6b3403/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140906/be6b3403/signature.asc>


More information about the Internal-cg mailing list