[Internal-cg] Consensus building discussion

Mary Uduma mnuduma at yahoo.com
Sat Sep 6 23:09:45 UTC 2014


Sleeping and typing, hit the wrong botton.

Please ignore my last unfinished mail.


On Sunday, September 7, 2014 2:07 AM, Mary Uduma <mnuduma at yahoo.com> wrote:

Jari , Arasteh and All,

Kindly make it easier for us to follow. I was about to congratulate the Group of 11 (G11) and all ICG members when Alice's mail came in with the old version.

I think we have progressed positively with the G11's  version, please let us not go back to the old version, reason being that ICG members are errand boys of the communities. The power to object regarding  any part of the proposal to NTIA is with each communities. 

In addition, the version looks balanced, what is left will be to do the minor edits and remove some redundant words like:

On Saturday, September 6, 2014 11:21 PM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net> wrote:

And in the after-the-meeting discussion I promised to send a link to the IETF document that describes the rough consensus process. Here:


(for the purposes of the ICG decision process, the important bit is how we deal with differing opinions, not the humming. so read it in that light.)


Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140906/a3258fff/attachment.html>

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list