[Internal-cg] Flow Chart - Assembling a unified consensusproposal..

[Manal Ismail]

I see your points ..

I think it first started by the chartering organizations of the cross
community working group, then (trying to find a venue for GAC input)
adding the GAC, then gathering all into a bigger shape representing
'Other interested parties' to make sure it covers all who are interested
.. Personally I'm flexible for any more accurate, representative and
inclusive way of reflecting this ..

 

Kind Regards

--Manal

 

From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of joseph alhadeff
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 5:01 PM
To: Milton L Mueller; internal-cg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Flow Chart - Assembling a unified
consensusproposal..

 

I am fine with that, but we should not cherry pick among members of the
ICG...

On 9/15/2014 9:58 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:

	Before we get into a game of listing dozens of specific
organizations, I would suggest broader categories, such as "users" or
"commercial and noncommercial users" etc. I don't think it's appropriate
to include the name of specific trade associations in that list. 

	--MM

	 

	 

	From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of joseph alhadeff
	
	
	

	 

	I think that this is helpful..  Please include ICC-BASIS in
other interested parties...

	 

	 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140915/6d47f1c0/attachment.html>