[Internal-cg] Flow Chart - Assembling a unified consensusproposal..

Manal Ismail manal at tra.gov.eg
Tue Sep 16 12:12:23 UTC 2014


I think this may be a good way forward .. 

Meanwhile as we hear other views, I think it would be also useful to
discuss / confirm participation of 'other interested parties' as
reflected in the diagram, i.e. through the 'operational communities'
during the first iteration then directly to ICG at later stages, is this
accurate?

 

Kind Regards

--Manal

 

From: joseph alhadeff [mailto:joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com] 
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 5:29 PM
To: Manal Ismail; Milton L Mueller; internal-cg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Flow Chart - Assembling a unified
consensusproposal..

 

Perhaps we list the main stakeholder community groups (Gov, business,
civil society, technical and academic...) and the ICG members orgs as
examples of representative types of organizations of the category?

Joe

On 9/15/2014 11:23 AM, Manal Ismail wrote:

	I see your points ..

	I think it first started by the chartering organizations of the
cross community working group, then (trying to find a venue for GAC
input) adding the GAC, then gathering all into a bigger shape
representing 'Other interested parties' to make sure it covers all who
are interested .. Personally I'm flexible for any more accurate,
representative and inclusive way of reflecting this ..

	 

	Kind Regards

	--Manal

	 

	From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of joseph alhadeff
	Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 5:01 PM
	To: Milton L Mueller; internal-cg at icann.org
	Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Flow Chart - Assembling a unified
consensusproposal..

	 

	I am fine with that, but we should not cherry pick among members
of the ICG...

	On 9/15/2014 9:58 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:

		Before we get into a game of listing dozens of specific
organizations, I would suggest broader categories, such as "users" or
"commercial and noncommercial users" etc. I don't think it's appropriate
to include the name of specific trade associations in that list. 

		--MM

		 

		 

		From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of joseph alhadeff
		
		
		
		

		 

		I think that this is helpful..  Please include ICC-BASIS
in other interested parties...

		 

		 

	 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140916/c3759fc1/attachment.html>


More information about the Internal-cg mailing list