[Internal-cg] Proposed agenda for Sept 17 call
paf at frobbit.se
Tue Sep 16 21:11:02 UTC 2014
FWIW, my view is that we should first wait for the open comment period to close, and absorb the comments, if any, on the pieces of the suggested process that is relevant to us.
On 16 sep 2014, at 17:01, Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in> wrote:
> Hi Wolf-Ulrich,
> Is there some uncertainty about the existence and role definition of that
> liaison still somewhat uncertain until the accountability process itself
> is finalized after the current comment period completes? I’m thinking that
> perhaps we could start our discussion about this on the mailing list and
> aim to complete it during or shortly after our next call (Oct 1).
> On 9/16/14, 1:44 PM, "WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de> wrote:
>> Thanks Alissa,
>> the ICG liaison to the ICANN Accountability & Governance Cross Community
>> Group should be selected before ICANN51. I wonder whether we could find
>> time to discuss the process timeline (nominations etc.).
>> Best regards
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> From: Alissa Cooper
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 8:23 PM
>> To: ICG
>> Subject: [Internal-cg] Proposed agenda for Sept 17 call
>> Please comment.
>> 1. Minutes approval from Aug 19 and Aug 26 conference calls – 3 minutes
>> 2. Consensus building document – 45 minutes
>> 3. Side meetings at ICANN51 – remaining time
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at icann.org
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
More information about the Internal-cg