[Internal-cg] Flow Chart - Assembling a unified consensus proposal..
narelle.clark at accan.org.au
Wed Sep 17 16:37:28 UTC 2014
I love the diagram. Sets things out cleanly.
I agree it is pointless to name all the interested parties, but rather use a more generic term if possible. Of course, if ICC-BASIS gets included then ISOC will have to be also... :)
My only additional comment is that if possible, surely the NTIA could start having a think, and making comments from Step 6? Hadn't we considered that previously?
From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller
Sent: Monday, 15 September 2014 11:58 PM
To: 'joseph alhadeff'; internal-cg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Flow Chart - Assembling a unified consensus proposal..
Before we get into a game of listing dozens of specific organizations, I would suggest broader categories, such as "users" or "commercial and noncommercial users" etc. I don't think it's appropriate to include the name of specific trade associations in that list.
From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of joseph alhadeff
I think that this is helpful.. Please include ICC-BASIS in other interested parties...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Internal-cg