[Internal-cg] ICG FAQ ..

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Manal
Alissa,Patrik,mohamed
Others
I disagree with Patrik that I should draft questions for the points that I
raised
Alissia decided  to assign the prepartion of FAQ to Manal and Martin AND
THEN WE RECEIVED THE DRAFR PREPARED.
Now I have made three rounds of questions .those who were assighned/
designated to prepare the draft of FAQ are kindly requested to put my
points in the propoer questions usuing the style that was utilized before.
I am awaiting for these very important questions to be answered

Moreover ,pls clarify what do you mean by

*" I do not disagree that the IANA Department at ICANN does more than the
contract with NTIA describes.  What the ICG is discussing is replacing the
stewardship by NTIA for the IANA functions that the NTIA oversees.  The
functions that NTIA oversees are described in the contract and those are
the only activities done by the IANA department that have oversight by
NTIA.   Any other, non-contractual activities of the IANA department which
may be described in SAC-067 have no contractual relationship with NTIA and
it stewardship"*
* .*
1 Please advise  what  what are the actions that  IANA Department at ICANN
does more than the contract with NTIA :

2Please also describe what are the IANA  functions that NTIA oversight
?Please cut and paste them from the contract as during the PUBLIC MEETING
we could not refer to the contract as many people may not know that

3,After transition who will oversight those actions?

4. What are those other, non-contractual activities of the IANA department
which may be described in SAC-067 have no contractual relationship with
NTIA and it stewardship"?
5. After transition who will perform that :
Regards
Kavouss  .


2014-09-30 19:36 GMT+02:00 Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg>:

>
>
>
>
> *From:* Milton L Mueller [mailto:mueller at syr.edu]
>
>
>
> *From:* Martin Boyle [mailto:Martin.Boyle at nominet.org.uk
> <Martin.Boyle at nominet.org.uk>]
>
> For Q15, Manal is right about running behind the moving train. But I now
> realise that the answer is very ICANN centric!  In part this is corrected
> in the next question, but I would suggest that  this question should look
> at the operational communities and those directly engaged with them (GAC,
> ALAC...), while the next question could then refer to addressing those who
> do not take part, but will be affected - the business community, ccTLDs
> that are not in ICANN etc
>
> MM: It seems then that the “real” answer to this question is that the
> Operational communities themselves should play a major role in the outreach
> to relevant non-ICANN communities
>
>
>
> MI: I fully agree .. and that’s why I suggested  to add “Inclusiveness/Outreach
> – check the level of inclusiveness and outreach of the provided process”
> to the criteria of individual proposals assessment, to make sure the Operational
> communities considers this seriously and play an active/proactive role in
> outreach ..
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140930/7ff4e9e1/attachment.html>