[Internal-cg] IETF assessment

[Jari Arkko]

FWIW, I have felt a need to make a new version of my assessment, given the good points that Milton made in his version.

This is based on Milton’s version and Jean-Jacques’ edits, but also makes several edits to highlight what I personally think is a correct characterisation of the situation. But indeed this is my personal assessment of the situation. I hope though that we might find some agreement on something along these lines. I can work with you and others during these two days to make edits as needed.

(And in any case, the important question is not necessarily the assessment docs, but rather whether we the ICG will ask something from the IETF or not.)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: individual-proposal-assessment-parameters-v05.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 42184 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20150206/edc6ae78/individual-proposal-assessment-parameters-v05-0001.docx>
-------------- next part --------------


Jari

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20150206/edc6ae78/signature-0001.asc>