[Internal-cg] [CWG-Stewardship] CWG-Stewardship Publishes Discussion Document for ICANN 52

[Patrik Fältström]

> On 7 feb 2015, at 13:00, Lynn St.Amour <Lynn at LStAmour.org> wrote:
> 
> On Feb 6, 2015, at 11:35 PM, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote:
> 
>> Lynn,
>> 
>> Let me try to understand what cation you requests.
>> 
>> Do you suggest that I (for example) as co-chair of the ICG reach out to the CWG [staff] and suggest a clarification in their documents on what they do mean with "IANA Function"?
> 
> I think this would be helpful (and this is mainly what I was referring to as Names gets the most attention), but maybe I am alone in seeing the potential for confusion.  If I am alone, then we should probably do nothing. Again, I am thinking more about those outside this Internet Governance community, and it seems a great opportunity to drive some clarity about the 3 OC's and their roles.  And, frankly, I am tired of reading articles that conflate the IANA functions and then tend to tie them all together in one bundle.

If no one objects, I will pass this message to the CWG.

   Patrik

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20150207/52dc0440/signature.asc>