[Internal-cg] Question for IANAPLAN and CRISP

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Alissa
Tks I have a small edit as follows :
If these aspects of the proposals are perceived as incompatible,the numbers
and protocol parameters communities  are invited to  reconsider their
viewpoint with a view  to reconcile them?
Kavouss

2015-02-09 3:07 GMT+01:00 Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in>:

> I will send this question to the communities at 6:00 UTC (about 4 hours
> from now). Please send any last-minute feedback before then.
>
> ---
>
> The IETF consensus as reflected in draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response did
> not include a formal request to change the arrangements regarding the IANA
> trademark and the iana.org domain as a requirement of its transition
> proposal. But Section III.A.2 of the RIR proposal says:
>
> "With regards to the IANA trademark and the IANA.ORG domain, it is the
> expectation of the Internet Number Community that both are associated with
> the IANA Numbering Services and not with a particular IANA Numbering
> Services Operator. Identifying an organization that is not the IANA
> Numbering Services Operator and which will permanently hold these assets
> will facilitate a smooth transition should another operator (or operators)
> be selected in the future. It is the preference of the Internet Number
> Community that the IANA trademark and the IANA.ORG domain name be
> transferred to an entity independent of the IANA Numbering Services
> Operator, in order to ensure that these assets are used in a
> non-discriminatory manner for the benefit of the entire community. From the
> Internet Number Community’s perspective, the IETF Trust would be an
> acceptable candidate for this role.”
>
> The numbers proposal sees these changes as a requirement of the transition
> and the protocols parameters proposal does not. If these aspects of the
> proposals are perceived as incompatible would the numbers and protocol
> parameters communities be willing to modify their proposals to reconcile
> them?
>
> Please either send us your response or let us know that you’ll need more
> time by February 21, 2015.
>
> Thanks,
> Alissa Cooper on behalf of the ICG
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20150209/6b198e16/attachment.html>