[Internal-cg] Question for IANAPLAN and CRISP

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Milton,
If the course of actions you have outlined will be followed then I have no
problem to  follow the stepwise course of actions.
By the way I read carefully and listen carefully thus no need to be
reminded by any one as I am not so ding
Tks Kavouss

2015-02-09 4:55 GMT+01:00 Russ Mundy <mundy at tislabs.com>:

>
> On Feb 9, 2015, at 10:07 AM, Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in> wrote:
>
> The numbers proposal sees these changes as a requirement of the transition
> and the protocols parameters proposal does not. If these aspects of the
> proposals are perceived as incompatible would the numbers and protocol
> parameters communities be willing to modify their proposals to reconcile
> them?
>
>
> Alissa,
>
> Thanks for pulling the discussion together.  I wouldn't object to the
> current wording of the question but think that the "question" paragraph
> could be a bit clearer so let me suggest the following para replace above:
>
> The ICG perceives that the protocol parameters and numbers proposals are
> incompatible on this point, i.e., the numbers proposal sees these changes
> as a requirement of the transition and the protocols parameters proposal
> does not.  Would the numbers and protocol parameters communities be willing
> to modify their proposals to reconcile them or describe how the current
> proposals are compatible?
>
> Russ
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20150209/883e3d07/attachment.html>