[Internal-cg] statement Steve Crocker
joseph alhadeff
joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com
Thu Feb 12 15:13:49 UTC 2015
How would we factor this in the revision to our timeline?
On 2/12/2015 4:40 AM, WUKnoben wrote:
> Please find here the statement as read.
>>
>> We have received several questions requesting clarification as to how
>> ICANN will handle receipt of the proposal from the ICG and the Work
>> Stream 1 proposal from the CCWG. We hope the following will be helpful.
>>
>> NTIA is expecting coordinated proposals from both groups. They
>> cannot act on just one. Further, they expect the ICG proposal will
>> take into account the accountability mechanisms proposed by the CCWG.
>> We are heartened by the close coordination between the groups,
>> including liaisons from the ICG to the CCWG. ICANN is expecting to
>> receive both proposals at roughly the same time. When ICANN receives
>> these proposals, we will forward them promptly and without
>> modification to NTIA. As we have previously stated, if we do submit
>> the proposals with an accompanying communication of comments, they
>> will be on points we had already shared with the community during the
>> development of the proposals.
>>
>> We therefore encourage the groups to continue coordinating closely to
>> ensure ICANN receives the proposals together and is able to provide
>> them to NTIA in a coordinated manner.
>>
>> With respect to improvements in our accountability, we are definitely
>> open to improvements.
>>
> It will also be posted
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Wolf-Ulrich
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20150212/ff576a53/attachment.html>
More information about the Internal-cg
mailing list