[Internal-cg] Fwd: [NRO-IANAXFER] Next steps?

[Alissa Cooper]

This is relevant to some of the questions Wolf-Ulrich has raised about implementation, so I’m forwarding it.

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>
> Subject: Re: [NRO-IANAXFER] Next steps?
> Date: January 26, 2015 at 6:12:27 PM PST
> To: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
> Cc: "ianaxfer at nro.net" <ianaxfer at nro.net>
> 
> Hello Seun and colleagues on the IANAXFER list,
> 
> 
> 
> Thank you once again Seun for your question about the next steps.
> I think this is a useful question for others in the community as well.
> 
> As you are aware, our proposal to the ICG describes high level
> principles about the Review Committee and the SLA including "IANA
> Service Level Agreement Principles" in the proposal, so RIRs will
> consider implementation based on this guidance.
> 
> Our role as the CRISP team is to provide guidance to the RIRs in
> the implementation of the proposal, and the details and process of
> implementation of the proposal is the responsibility of the RIRs. The
> charter of the review committee and actual contract text are part of
> implementation of the proposal which is the responsibility of the RIRs.
> 
> Having said this, the CRISP Team believes it is important for the
> community to have clear visibility that RIRs acknowledges this proposal
> which references actions by them.
> 
> Therefore, after Step2 of the ICG's latest timeline, when the proposals
> by all three operational communities are consolidated by the ICG, the
> CRISP Team plans to formally inform the executives of the RIRs about the
> proposal submitted to the ICG which references actions by the RIRs.
> 
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/icg-process-timeline-07jan15-en.pdf
> 
> We expect that there will be formal acknowledgement from the five RIRs
> about this, so it is clear to the community that the RIRs will take the
> appropriate steps to implement the proposal from the Number Resources
> community. We trust each RIR will consult with their respective
> communities as needed in preparing the SLA, and the Review Committee is
> to be established in an open and bottom-up manner, as we have described
> in the proposal.
> 
> I hope this clarifies the role of the CRISP team and RIRs in future steps.
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Izumi Okutani
> The CRISP Team
> 
> On 2015/01/22 23:45, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>> Great thanks for the first level clarification Izumi.
>> 
>> Cheers!
>> 
>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello Seun,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Just from what I can answer for now,
>>> 
>>>>> - SLA requirements
>>> 
>>> "IANA Service Level Agreement Principles" are described in Section
>>> III.A.3 of our proposal, as you are probably aware. This lists
>>> principles and elements to be included in the SLA.
>>> 
>>> Both of the processes listed below will be lead by the RIRs and not the
>>> CRISP Team. I trust the RIRs will start the process, so that we have
>>> these them ready before the transition.
>>> 
>>>>> - Charter of review committee
>>>>> - Contract actual text
>>> 
>>> I need to double check if there is anything more we can say at this
>>> stage as the CRISP Team - Thanks for your question and patience!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Izumi
>>> 
>>> On 2015/01/22 13:29, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>>>> Hello Izumi,
>>>> 
>>>> You may have missed this mail, could you/or any crisp team kindly provide
>>>> update?
>>>> 
>>>> Just to clarify (in line of recent development), not all the 3 items are
>>>> expected to be developed by this WG but will be good to know when those
>>>> processes will start.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> 
>>>> sent from Google nexus 4
>>>> kindly excuse brevity and typos.
>>>> On 21 Jan 2015 09:37, "Seun Ojedeji" <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hello Izumi, CRISP team
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks again to you and the entire team. I just want to ask about what
>>> the
>>>>> next line of action will be? i.e are we to wait until the ICG release
>>> their
>>>>> final proposal? or while we wait on ICG, we also start the drafting
>>> process
>>>>> for the following:
>>>>> 
>>>>> - Charter of review committee
>>>>> - SLA requirements
>>>>> - Contract actual text
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks as i look forward to your response
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> *Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:
>>>>> http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile:
>>> +2348035233535**alt
>>>>> email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
>>>>> <seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*
>>>>> 
>>>>> The key to understanding is humility - my view !
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ianaxfer mailing list
> ianaxfer at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20150224/c74f06b2/attachment-0001.html>