[IOT] IOT plans

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear David

Tks for refreshing our mind

it is a nice idea to have such a search in the work to see whether there
are unfinished topics which directly or indirectly affect the work

Regards

Kavouss


On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 4:57 PM, McAuley, David via IOT <iot at icann.org>
wrote:

> Dear members of the IRP IOT,
>
>
>
> It was nice to see some of you at ICANN61 last week during a very busy
> schedule there.
>
>
>
> Now that ICANN61 is over and we ate catching back up I want to mention a
> few things about our plans to continue our work.
>
>
>
> First, on the repose issue, I said I would go back in the archives to do a
> deep dive on what has happened so far – I started that work but with Adobe
> down it may take a bit longer than I had hoped. Bernie will let us know how
> things are progressing with the Adobe issue.
>
>
>
> Meantime, we should explore further the ‘two buckets’ idea – of releasing
> the rules we are finished with while we wrap up work on repose and possibly
> other open items.
>
>
>
> In this regard, I may send to the list a treatment of specifying the
> ‘required elements’ of an IRP complaint (see Bylaw section 4.3(n)(iv)(C)).
> I am thinking that that will probably not be a difficult issue to address.
>
>
>
> So, I will be writing more in the next week and look forward to connecting
> again.
>
>
>
> Best wishes to all,
>
> David
>
>
>
> David McAuley
>
> Sr International Policy & Business Development Manager
>
> Verisign Inc.
>
> 703-948-4154 <(703)%20948-4154>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IOT mailing list
> IOT at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/iot
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/iot/attachments/20180321/561df22a/attachment.html>