[IPC-GNSO] [IPC Discussion List] Fwd: [council] possible motion - would need to request 10 day waiver.

[Greg Shatan]

I suggest we clarify if that was the intent.

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Metalitz, Steven <met at msk.com> wrote:

> I read this as referring to GNSO resolutions and would have no direct
> impact on anything IPC chose to say. Is that correct?
>
>
>
> Sent with Good (www.good.com)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From: *Greg Shatan [gregshatanipc at gmail.com]
> *Sent: *Monday, October 19, 2015 02:35 AM Pacific Standard Time
> *To: *McGrady, Paul D.
> *Cc: *IPC-GNSO (ipc-gnso at icann.org)
> *Subject: *Re: [IPC-GNSO] [IPC Discussion List] Fwd: [council] possible
> motion - would need to request 10 day waiver.
>
> I certainly think so.  I applaud Avri and the NCSG for taking the
> initiative on this effort.  We can discuss today when we meet to see if
> there are any refinements to suggest.
>
> Greg
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:28 AM, McGrady, Paul D. <PMcGrady at winston.com>
> wrote:
>
>> So, if we don’t think this is a problem, should we use the opportunity to
>> play nice with the NCSG and affirmatively through our support behind it?
>> Brian, Heather, what think ye?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Greg Shatan [mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Monday, October 19, 2015 4:11 AM
>> *To:* McGrady, Paul D.
>> *Cc:* IPC-GNSO (ipc-gnso at icann.org)
>> *Subject:* [IPC Discussion List] Fwd: [council] possible motion - would
>> need to request 10 day waiver.
>>
>>
>>
>> I think the potentially muzzling issue is  the last part of the Resolved
>> section (in bold), but it only relates to declaring support or opposition
>> to outcomes, not general statements, which is all CSG would do, so 8'm not
>> concerned.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The GNSO reiterates its support for the process that is ongoing in
>> CCWG-Accountability,
>>
>> its commitment to participating in continuing discussions with the goal
>> of finding solution with broad agreement for ICANN accountabity in
>> preparations for IANA transition, and
>>
>> to
>> *working through the process as agreed upon in the charter before making
>> any resolutions declaring support or opposition to possible outcomes.*
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:25 AM, McGrady, Paul D. <PMcGrady at winston.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> All, please see below for last minute motion by the NCSG.  A few
>> questions:
>>
>> 1.  Does anyone read this as a muzzling of individual
>> constituencies/SGs?  I know that such was the fear but it isn't obvious to
>> me that such is the case;
>> 2.  Assuming "no" to the above question, are there any other concerns
>> with this resolution?
>> 3.  Assuming "yes" to the above question, should Heather or Brian reach
>> out to Avri to get clarification that this isn't meant to interfere with
>> speech from the constituencies/SG?
>>
>> Best,
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org]
>> On Behalf Of Avri Doria
>> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 6:11 PM
>> To: <council at gnso.icann.org>
>> Subject: [council] possible motion - would need to request 10 day waiver.
>>
>>
>> To my fellow council members,
>>
>> I would like to offer one last motion before I end my tenure on the GNSO
>> council.
>>
>> I know I have missed the motion deadline and therefore request
>> consideration for waiver of the 10 day rule for motions, noting that this
>> request is submitted at least 24 hours before the meeting scheduled for 21
>> October 2015.
>>
>> I also note that I am available to consider any friendly amendments that
>> might be required for acceptance of the resolution that might come based on
>> Stakeholder Group and Constituency consideration of this motion.
>>
>> --- Motion
>>
>> Whereas
>>
>> On 13 November 2014 the GNSO approved the charter for a Cross Community
>> Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability (CCWG-Accountabilty);
>>
>> On  3 August the Public Comment on the CCWG-Accountability 2nd Draft
>> Proposal was initiated, which ended on 12 Septemebr 2015;
>>
>> The CCWG-Accountabilty has analyzed the comments received in the review
>> of the 2nd draft and is working toward updating its reference
>> implementation taking into account the concerns expressed in those comments;
>>
>> and The CCWG-Accountabilty  is working in a considered and collegial
>> manner to achieve a consensus solution to ICANN Accountability;
>>
>> Acknowledging
>>
>> the superb and continuing leadership of CCWG-Accountabilty by the team
>> which includes the GNSO appointed co-chair Thomas Rickert, to whom we are
>> grateful for his time and consistent effort;
>>
>>
>> Resolved
>>
>> The GNSO reiterates its support for the process that is ongoing in
>> CCWG-Accountability,
>>
>> its commitment to participating in continuing discussions with the goal
>> of finding solution with broad agreement for ICANN accountabity in
>> preparations for IANA transition, and
>>
>> to working through the process as agreed upon in the charter before
>> making any resolutions declaring support or opposition to possible outcomes.
>>
>> ---
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> avri
>>
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
>> The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential.
>> Therefore, if this message has been received in error, please delete it
>> without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive
>> any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without
>> the permission of the author.
>> _______________________________________________
>> IPC-GNSO mailing list
>> IPC-GNSO at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ipc-gnso
>>
>>
>>
>> The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential.
>> Therefore, if this message has been received in error, please delete it
>> without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive
>> any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without
>> the permission of the author.
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ipc-gnso/attachments/20151019/9d57eeef/attachment-0001.html>