[IRT.RegDataPolicy] Rec 10 consideration: error in recommendation to be corrected? or proceed with implementing the recommendation as is.

[theo geurts]

+1 Sarah.

Theo

On 26-8-2019 20:48, Sarah Wyld wrote:
>
> Hi Dennis,
>
> Yes, this appears to be a drafting error.
>
> We should maintain the status quo in this area; the registry must 
> publish the registry expiry date, and the registrar must publish the 
> registrar registration expiration date.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- 
> Sarah Wyld
> Domains Product Team
> Tucows
> +1.416 535 0123 Ext. 1392
>
>   
> On 8/21/2019 8:23 PM, Dennis Chang wrote:
>>
>> Dear IRT,
>>
>> Thanks for supporting the IRT call today.
>>
>> Regarding the Recommendation 10, there was a suggestion that we have 
>> a table.
>>
>> I wanted to show you this IRT.Data Elements Matrix today but 
>> unfortunately my computer quit on me.
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1c235iuKWX5-lKufkR67pPF0OEf-Fw3W94WPepCx4ep8/edit#gid=1382512791
>>
>> As you may recall, this matrix is referenced in the IRT.Rec 10 
>> Analysis document but may not have not been used the IRT in the analysis.
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OuZT7xL5wuV1ynVmpVNxFycU93gvPlvbzx_g9lXCYCw/edit# 
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OuZT7xL5wuV1ynVmpVNxFycU93gvPlvbzx_g9lXCYCw/edit>
>>
>> I believe the IRT.Data Elements Matrix already offers the table you 
>> are wanting.
>>
>> I draw your attention to the Registrar sheet cell 8X and 9X where 
>> we’ve flag these for IRT attention.
>>
>> We are making it clear here that what’s reflected is aligned with the 
>> recommendation and we are now considering changing this to be 
>> “inconsistent with the recommendation” due to an error in the 
>> recommendation language.
>>
>> We, as the implementation team, can deviate from the recommendation 
>> if we all agree that we are correcting an obvious error and not 
>> changing the policy.
>>
>> Lack of an IRT agreement is likely to default in the implementation 
>> language true to the recommendation language at least for the public 
>> comment.
>>
>> The way the recommendation reads now is Registry Expiry Date MUST be 
>> published by both Registrar and Registry Operators according to the 
>> recommendation, while Registrar Registration Expiration Date MAY be 
>> published
>>
>> I submit this for IRT consideration and proceeding with caution as 
>> not to rush an important implementaiton decision.
>>
>> —
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>>
>> Dennis S. Chang
>>
>> GDD Services & Engagement Program Director
>>
>> Telephone: +1 213 293 7889
>>
>> Skype: dennisSchang
>>
>> www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRT.RegDataPolicy mailing list
>> IRT.RegDataPolicy at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/irt.regdatapolicy
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRT.RegDataPolicy mailing list
> IRT.RegDataPolicy at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/irt.regdatapolicy
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/irt.regdatapolicy/attachments/20190826/b03bc545/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 216429 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/irt.regdatapolicy/attachments/20190826/b03bc545/image001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 163031 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/irt.regdatapolicy/attachments/20190826/b03bc545/image002.png>