[IRT.RegDataPolicy] Rec 9 Analysis Review

[Anderson, Marc]

Team,



I agree with Sarah on this.  Recommendations #9 directs ICANN, registries and registrars to look at “the Contracts” (here referring to applicable Registry Agreements and Registrar Accreditation Agreement) making updates “if needed” to be in line with purpose 5 (contractual compliance).



The recommendation notes that the contracts already provide the appropriate scope for contractual compliance requests and subsequent transfer.  New consensus policy language requiring Registry operators and registrars to transfer data to ICANN is not needed, nor is that what is called for by the recommendation.



Best,

Marc









From: IRT.RegDataPolicy <irt.regdatapolicy-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of Sarah Wyld
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 8:26 AM
To: irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] Rec 9 Analysis Review



Hello Team,

I have a question about the direction we're taking for Rec 9, and want to bring it up with the team for discussion. I am hoping we can go over it by email, as I will not be able to join you in Marrakech.

This draft policy section I think tries to encompass the intent of the Recommendation, it talks about how ICANN can require Rr/Ry to provide data, and our edits yesterday focused on ensuring that applicable laws are met, only relevant data is requested, etc.

But the Rec itself starts with "The EPDP Team recommends that updates, if needed, are made to the contractual requirements concerning the registration data elements for registries and registrars to transfer to ICANN Org the domain name registration data that they process when required/requested for purpose 5 (Contractual Compliance)."

Does this mean that, instead of creating a new policy section about it, we actually need to go back to other existing ICANN contractual requirements and modify those to have these limitations about applicable laws, relevant data, etc.?  It does not seem easily clear to me, so hopefully better minds will have some ideas.

Thanks,

--
Sarah Wyld
Domains Product Team
Tucows
+1.416 535 0123 Ext. 1392



On 6/20/2019 3:33 AM, Dennis Chang wrote:

   Dear IRT,



   The recommendations 9 is open for IRT review and added to the IRT Task List as:

19

Review Recommendation 9 Analysis: Ry&Rr to ICANN org<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tEPl9E1Geq5Z_t1dPU2DcZVdnuycx1h6pmhFweKHaaA/edit>

20190630



   The review document with the proposed policy language has been added to the IRT Team Drive.

   The task assignment is linked to it for your future reference.

   https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tEPl9E1Geq5Z_t1dPU2DcZVdnuycx1h6pmhFweKHaaA/edit



   Thank you for your continuing support.



   —

   Kind Regards,

   Dennis S. Chang

   GDD Services & Engagement Program Director

   Telephone: +1 213 293 7889

   Skype: dennisSchang

   www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org>









   _______________________________________________
   IRT.RegDataPolicy mailing list
   IRT.RegDataPolicy at icann.org<mailto:IRT.RegDataPolicy at icann.org>
   https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/irt.regdatapolicy

   _______________________________________________
   By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/irt.regdatapolicy/attachments/20190621/6910da9c/attachment.html>