[IRT.RegDataPolicy] [Ext] Re: Review Board resolution 2019.11.07.13 on Thick WHOIS Transition Policy

Tue Nov 19 17:32:45 UTC 2019

Hello Beth,

Thanks bringing this up in an email rather than at the IRT meeting.
This will allow us to focus on the IRT meetings on the substantive discussion on the policy implementation.

  1.  There is no expected timing from the board on this. The Board is aware of the IRT’s statement to the GNSO Council to come up with the timeline after the recommendations analysis is completed adequately.
  2.  GAC on the other hand does have a clear expectation from the IRT which was published as a part of its GAC Communiqué – Montréal, Canada.
     *   https://gac.icann.org/contentMigrated/icann66-montreal-communique
     *   The pertinent part is here: “2. Domain Name Registration Directory Service and Data Protection With regard to Phase 1 of the EPDP,
a. The GAC advises the Board to:

i. Take all possible steps to ensure that the ICANN org and the EPDP Phase 1 Implementation Review team generate a detailed work plan identifying an updated realistic schedule to complete its work and provide and inform the GAC on the status of its progress by January 3, 2020;”

     *   It’s important to note that GAC advice is made to the Board, not to the implementation team directly. Therefore, does not constitute an official action for the implementation team.
     *   The timing of the Board consideration for this advice won’t be until mid-January 2020 so I do not expect to receive a Board direction on this till after the GAC’s requested date of January 3, 2020.
     *   We, however, will prepare a realistic schedule as part of our existing plan,  We’ll see how close we are with the analysis completion to estimate the timeline with a brief discussion tomorrow.
     *   We are fortunate to have Laureen, a GAC member,  who could provide further insight to the IRT if needed.
  1.  The point about delivering the impact assessment to the GNSO Council is Rec 27. Nothing new here for us. This is to advise the contractual compliance enforcement.  We continue to work on Rec 27 and keep the IRT informed.

This offers the opportunity to remind you of the IRT task #74.
74

Provide inputs to the Timeline planning sheet in the IRT workbook

20191119

I am particularly interested in seeing your inputs for the “6-month implementation period.”
If there is an argument for changing this default 6-months, let’s capture that in writing as we’ll need them for public comment also.

Thanks all for your support and making this process efficient.
Dennis Chang

From: Elizabeth Bacon <beth at pir.org>
Date: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 at 07:12
To: Dennis Chang <dennis.chang at icann.org>, "IRT.RegDataPolicy at icann.org" <irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] Re: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] Review Board resolution 2019.11.07.13 on Thick WHOIS Transition Policy

Hello All,
I wanted to follow up on Dennis’ email below and thank Dennis for flagging it for us. I have one question on this and one comment. First, Dennis, do you know what the expected timing is on these items? Are they simply to be included with our IRT Report?

Second, as the GNSO is the genesis of the Thick WHOIS Policy and ICANN was responsible for deferring its implementation, I would suggest that we simply note the direct impacts of the Final Report Recommendations on the text of the Policy (as is already required by Rec#27), but defer to the GNSO for any action. I think that process is clear from the Resolution language, but I think it’s important that the IRT resist the urge to offer any opinion or advice as that is the role of the GNSO.
Thanks,
Beth

From: "IRT.RegDataPolicy" <irt.regdatapolicy-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Dennis Chang <dennis.chang at icann.org>
Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 at 3:13 PM
To: "IRT.RegDataPolicy at icann.org" <irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org>
Subject: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] Review Board resolution 2019.11.07.13 on Thick WHOIS Transition Policy

Dear IRT,

As you may have noted, the ICANN66 Board Resolution contains a couple of tasks for us which I add to the IRT task list for us to track
75

Review Board Resolution Deferral of Compliance Enforcement of Thick WHOIS Consensus Policy [icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources_board-2Dmaterial_resolutions-2D2019-2D11-2D07-2Den-231.i&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=dqLP1wJqBvDSYLKrSEaAkCi_Kv0Mk5D_d32n29DHCN8&m=uQ2joNfxphHpIzAB1pvQEkesaM4Wt6dzWybDhe72VyY&s=jFhRtn-91wLzg_ulcKgPWIjuqM_DjTg_3MRX_elATaM&e=>

20191119

Copied here for your convenience

Resolved (2019.11.07.13), the President and CEO, or his designee(s), is authorized to defer compliance enforcement of the Thick WHOIS Transition Policy until all of the following have occurred:
§  the gTLD Registration Data Policy Implementation Review Team (IRT) completes its review and establishes an implementation timeline estimate of the Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) Team's recommendations [gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_default_files_file_field-2Dfile-2Dattach_epdp-2Dgtld-2Dregistration-2Ddata-2Dspecs-2Dfinal-2D20feb19-2Den.pdf&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=dqLP1wJqBvDSYLKrSEaAkCi_Kv0Mk5D_d32n29DHCN8&m=uQ2joNfxphHpIzAB1pvQEkesaM4Wt6dzWybDhe72VyY&s=aEQd5ycE5S1VRvnrfm25bEwJ4zMKiqeAmzdqoB3A4Ts&e=> as adopted [icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources_board-2Dmaterial_resolutions-2D2019-2D05-2D15-2Den-231.b&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=dqLP1wJqBvDSYLKrSEaAkCi_Kv0Mk5D_d32n29DHCN8&m=uQ2joNfxphHpIzAB1pvQEkesaM4Wt6dzWybDhe72VyY&s=FzHGgCNUFrxPzdUV4d4FRLYJmcRG11gUojHYuTm-a7Q&e=> by the ICANN Board on 15 May 2019;
§  ICANN org and the IRT provide the GNSO Council with the required information on the impacts of the EPDP Team's recommendations on existing policies and procedures (including the Thick WHOIS Transition policy), and
§  the GNSO Council makes a determination on whether to take action on updates to relevant policies and procedures (which could include additional policy work, guidance, or other actions to be determined) impacting the Thick WHOIS Transition Policy.
--
Kind Regards,
Dennis S. Chang
GDD Programs Director
Phone: +1 213 293 7889
Sykpe: dennisSchang
www.icann.org [icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.icann.org&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=dqLP1wJqBvDSYLKrSEaAkCi_Kv0Mk5D_d32n29DHCN8&m=uQ2joNfxphHpIzAB1pvQEkesaM4Wt6dzWybDhe72VyY&s=jS-bb417olAuzID_4fHBA_T6P3c63T5CHD8LbgbgUVk&e=> One World – One Internet
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/irt.regdatapolicy/attachments/20191119/521a8807/attachment.html>