[IRT.RegDataPolicy] Rec5 IRT comments closing - collection

[Anderson, Marc]

Dennis / IPT and IRT colleagues,



I gave Rec #5 another read and I don’t think its quite ready to close.  I added comments directly to the Google document, but I’ll recap here as well.



In 5.7 the Registrar Registration Expiration Date is listed as a MAY generate or collect.  I think we’ve discussed that this should actually be a MUST for Registrars and moved up to 5.1.  It’s the Registry Expiry Date that should be a MAY here.



5.8 covers the optional Name Server and DNSSEC elements.  I understand that some Registrars offer Name Servers and DNSSEC signing as services.  I don’t think the language in 5.8 necessarily prohibits that, but I’m wondering if it would make sense to add language accounting for that scenario.  Maybe an implementation note mentioning that Registrars may provide that information as a service?



Finally in the implementation notes, I’m wondering where the language in part 3 came from.  It’s not something I remember discussing in the EPDP and I can’t trace it back to any language in the phase 1 recommendations.  Is it needed or can it be deleted?



Best,

Marc









From: IRT.RegDataPolicy <irt.regdatapolicy-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of Dennis Chang
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 7:54 PM
To: irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [IRT.RegDataPolicy] Rec5 IRT comments closing - collection



Dear IRT,



Calling to close IRT comments on the recommendation #5 regarding collection.



53

IRT review closing Recommendation #5 Analysis - collection<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zvmGUdvBBNUIQKEe70RNT4ayydyXtIPLd5npJ_7a1Ig/edit>

20191029





--

Kind Regards,

Dennis S. Chang

GDD Programs Director

Phone: +1 213 293 7889

Sykpe: dennisSchang

www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org> One World – One Internet

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/irt.regdatapolicy/attachments/20191018/1c0fd4a4/attachment.html>