[IRT.RegDataPolicy] Recommendation 8

[Dennis Chang]

Hi Roger,

You are correct that the IRT was assigned to review 8.3 only.

For 8.1 and 82, I communicate to the IRT by using the Rec Analysis sheet in the IRT workbook.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1r8yMMEFIFS-KHGMsnLdVbdn0O_GWhf7vNLlNIZYP47U/edit#gid=0
See Cell E9: IPT action for Rec 8.
“8.1 & 8.2 Ensure DPAs, as appropriate, are entered into with data escrow agents.
8.3 draft policy language: provided by the link in D7”

This was the process I was using back in June.
We switched to creating separate docs for each recommendations per Theo’s suggestion in July.
I’ll see if I can make this more clear for the IRT in terms of assignments.

As of now, no IRT assignments for the 8.1 and 8.2 so you didn’t miss anything.

Thanks f0r being vigilant and the question.

Dennis Chang

From: "IRT.RegDataPolicy" <irt.regdatapolicy-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Roger D Carney <rcarney at godaddy.com>
Date: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 at 11:52 AM
To: "irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org" <irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org>
Subject: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] Recommendation 8

Good Afternoon,

Marc brought up a point about Data Escrow providers today on the call that made me go back and look at recommendation 8 and I realized that we may have missed parts of this recommendation in our IRT work. Line 19 (#18) of our Task List covers recommendation 8 sub item 3 but I don’t see where we scheduled/reviewed sub items 1 and 2 of recommendation 8.

Dennis, are these items covered somewhere else that I am missing?


Thanks
Roger

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/irt.regdatapolicy/attachments/20190919/2d0008a1/attachment.html>