[IRT.RegDataPolicy] Rec 28 - Implementation date - call for IRT comment completion

[Rubens Kuhl]

> Em 25 de set de 2019, à(s) 09:42:000, Luc SEUFER <lseufer at dclgroup.eu> escreveu:
> 
> Hello Marc et alia,
> 
> I also believe that we should inform the Counsel that the original date cannot be met.
> 
> Regarding the incentive, as much I like ICANN waiving its fees (or offering us free t-shirts),

I haven't suggested fee incentives because they are prone to be anti-competitive (per DUM favours registrars with many DUMs, per accreditation favours drop catch registrars) and trigger endless conversations about budgeting.

> I trust there will be too many unknowns here. Even after its finalization, the policy will be so far reaching that there will be some side effects we won’t have expected. Plus, speaking as a registrar, we will be dependent on the registries’ implementation.

Different from thick WHOIS where registrars simply proxied requests, the world of EPDP and RDAP brought data primacy to registrars. So most registrars won't depend on registries.


Rubens


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/irt.regdatapolicy/attachments/20190925/894c0997/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 528 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/irt.regdatapolicy/attachments/20190925/894c0997/signature.asc>