[IRT.RegDataPolicy] Recommendation 8

[Dennis Chang]

Thanks to Sarah for organizing the recommendations regarding the DPAs.
I agreed with your assessment regarding DPAs.

To summarize, I see the recommendations in two distinct categories of parties.

ICANN org & Contracted Parties

ICANN org & Third-Parties

Rec 19

Rec 8: Data Escrow Provider
Rec 22: Dispute Resolution Providers
Rec 26: Data Escrow Providers and EBERO providers



I hope this view helps and it aligns with the IRT’s view.
Please note that I am using “third-parties” rather than “non-contracted parties” that the Rec 26 uses.

We do plan on working the implementation for the third-parties in a similar way as you suggest.
I will keep the IRT in the loop as we make progress.

Thanks
Dennis Chang

From: "IRT.RegDataPolicy" <irt.regdatapolicy-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Sarah Wyld <swyld at tucows.com>
Organization: Tucows
Date: Friday, September 20, 2019 at 7:55 AM
To: "irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org" <irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] Recommendation 8


Thanks to Roger for bringing this up, and to Dennis for that helpful explanation.

There are four recommendations pertaining to DPAs (8, 19, 22, 26, see attached); they're each worded slightly differently but with ultimately the same effect. As such, I'd think that we should address them similarly here in the IRT, so if we are writing policy language for Rec's 19 and 22 shouldn't we also do the same for Rec's 8 and 26?

I'm also still not quite sure that it's ideal to combine the Rec's 19 and 22 into one policy section, since they are for agreements between different sets of parties (19 is between ICANN and the CP, 22 is between ICANN and the dispute resolution provider).

Thanks,





--

Sarah Wyld

Domains Product Team

Tucows

+1.416 535 0123 Ext. 1392




On 9/19/2019 1:44 PM, Dennis Chang wrote:
Hi Roger,

You are correct that the IRT was assigned to review 8.3 only.

For 8.1 and 82, I communicate to the IRT by using the Rec Analysis sheet in the IRT workbook.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1r8yMMEFIFS-KHGMsnLdVbdn0O_GWhf7vNLlNIZYP47U/edit#gid=0
See Cell E9: IPT action for Rec 8.
“8.1 & 8.2 Ensure DPAs, as appropriate, are entered into with data escrow agents.
8.3 draft policy language: provided by the link in D7”

This was the process I was using back in June.
We switched to creating separate docs for each recommendations per Theo’s suggestion in July.
I’ll see if I can make this more clear for the IRT in terms of assignments.

As of now, no IRT assignments for the 8.1 and 8.2 so you didn’t miss anything.

Thanks f0r being vigilant and the question.

Dennis Chang

From: "IRT.RegDataPolicy" <irt.regdatapolicy-bounces at icann.org><mailto:irt.regdatapolicy-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Roger D Carney <rcarney at godaddy.com><mailto:rcarney at godaddy.com>
Date: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 at 11:52 AM
To: "irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org"<mailto:irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org> <irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org><mailto:irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org>
Subject: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] Recommendation 8

Good Afternoon,

Marc brought up a point about Data Escrow providers today on the call that made me go back and look at recommendation 8 and I realized that we may have missed parts of this recommendation in our IRT work. Line 19 (#18) of our Task List covers recommendation 8 sub item 3 but I don’t see where we scheduled/reviewed sub items 1 and 2 of recommendation 8.

Dennis, are these items covered somewhere else that I am missing?


Thanks
Roger




_______________________________________________

IRT.RegDataPolicy mailing list

IRT.RegDataPolicy at icann.org<mailto:IRT.RegDataPolicy at icann.org>

https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/irt.regdatapolicy



_______________________________________________

By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/irt.regdatapolicy/attachments/20190926/5e40f4da/attachment.html>