[IRT.RegDataPolicy] EPDP phase 1 - Rec 12 follow up

[Ducos, Sebastien]

Dear Team,

This has been transmitted to the GNSO Council ExCom today.
I will ask for an update on it during our Council call next week if the ExCom doesn’t react before then.

Kindly,


Sebastien Ducos
GoDaddy Registry | Senior Client Services Manager
[signature_2133077481]
+61449623491
Level 8, 10 Queens Road
Melbourne, VIC, Australia
3004
sebastien at registry.godaddy<mailto:sebastien at registry.godaddy>
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.linkedin.com/in/sebastienducos__;!!N14HnBHF!pBtfblmTvBPhFYMd_i87-Xtqr-0PEdzcWHKFl2pFRFKzs2Qk-n--IjQrhNgpzsSJSZY0NQ$ <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.linkedin.com/in/sebastienducos__;!!N14HnBHF!pBtfblmTvBPhFYMd_i87-Xtqr-0PEdzcWHKFl2pFRFKzs2Qk-n--IjQrhNgpzsQl3A8zVw$ >


From: "IRT.RegDataPolicy" <irt.regdatapolicy-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of "Anderson, Marc via IRT.RegDataPolicy" <irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org>
Reply to: "Anderson, Marc" <mcanderson at verisign.com>
Date: Wednesday, 12 August 2020 at 8:31 pm
To: "irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org" <irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org>
Subject: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] EPDP phase 1 - Rec 12 follow up

Notice: This email is from an external sender.


Dennis, IPT and IRT colleagues,

Following up on our Rec 12 discussion from today’s call.  We had a question about the state of the Rec 12 consultation between the ICANN Board and GNSO Council on the portions of Rec #12 not adopted by the Board.

As a result of those consultations the GNSO council passed a “supplemental Recommendations”.  The motion and voting results were communicated and detailed in this letter from Council to the Board on 23 December 2019:

https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/drazek-to-botterman-23dec19-en.pdf__;!!N14HnBHF!pBtfblmTvBPhFYMd_i87-Xtqr-0PEdzcWHKFl2pFRFKzs2Qk-n--IjQrhNgpzsSJxT7UKw$ 

Maarten responded on 03 February 2020 in this letter:

https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/botterman-to-drazek-03feb20-en.pdf__;!!N14HnBHF!pBtfblmTvBPhFYMd_i87-Xtqr-0PEdzcWHKFl2pFRFKzs2Qk-n--IjQrhNgpzsTNB4SwfQ$ 

In it he says that the Board will consider the Council’s supplemental recommendation.  I’m unsure if they have but I haven’t heard anything either way.

The ask from today’s call was for Sebastien to enquire at Council if anything has been heard on this and for Dennis to follow up with the Board to find out the status.

Best,
Marc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/irt.regdatapolicy/attachments/20200813/959466cd/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 39875 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/irt.regdatapolicy/attachments/20200813/959466cd/image001.png>