[IRT.RegDataPolicy] Question re non-OneDoc recs

[Sarah Wyld]

Hi Dennis and team,

Thank you for that info.

I do agree that items like the DPA are not as time-critical. That said,
these are still policy recommendations that need to be implemented, so I
would expect that you're tracking the status of all those items; is
there a place where IRT members can view the status/next steps/timing
for all these non-OneDoc recommendations?

This also ties into the Rec 27
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LNTK48adeeU_dmjSBGth04dqDdhamVKHbP5FQ4T4EI8/edit>
(other impacted policies/procedures) work. I see that the Wave 2
analysis is scheduled to be complete soon and I'm curious if that timing
remains as documented there or will be extended.

Thanks,

-- 
Sarah Wyld
Domains Product Team
Tucows
+1.416 535 0123 Ext. 1392

 

On 1/7/2020 3:19 PM, Dennis Chang wrote:
>
> Hi Sarah and team,
>
>  
>
> For Rec 26, IPT is managing this without IRT involvement.
>
> I added to the analysis doc for clarity  _26: DPA 3rd Parties
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pHDZQEugoJBlbCl0mUPNjuliCce7I9T5v_M5aTQ-PCU/edit>_
>
>  
>
> Since this is NOT required for the public comment, it isn’t as time
> critical as the DPA with CPH.
>
> 76
>
> 	
>
> _Review RegDataPolicy DocMap
> <https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1UEF-R3R8fDXsffcNcz9fjtqApsuk2un0AlkC9Prxj0o/edit?folder=0AJcLhUsejJRYUk9PVA>_
>
> 	
>
> 20191216
>
>  
>
> For the DPA with CPH, there is a team of CPH working on this with
> ICANN org.
>
> It will be provided to the IRT when ready.
>
> Since that team has determined that this is a required document for
> the Public Comment,
>
> they are working with that timeline in mind.
>
> We should receive their status at the IRT meeting next Wed.
>
>  
>
> Thanks
>
> Dennis Chang
>
>  
>
> *From: *"IRT.RegDataPolicy" <irt.regdatapolicy-bounces at icann.org> on
> behalf of Sarah Wyld <swyld at tucows.com>
> *Organization: *Tucows
> *Date: *Tuesday, January 7, 2020 at 11:49
> *To: *"irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org" <irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[IRT.RegDataPolicy] Question re non-OneDoc recs
>
>  
>
> Hi Dennis and team,
>
> For recommendations that have required work but are not part of the
> new Policy, e.g. Rec 26
> (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pHDZQEugoJBlbCl0mUPNjuliCce7I9T5v_M5aTQ-PCU/edit),
> how are those tasks tracked?
>
> I looked in the IRT Workbook, we have some tasks for reviewing the rec
> analysis, but the actual task of producing the DPAs, where is that
> tracked? When looking at the Timeline tab in the IRT Workbook should
> those be there?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- 
> Sarah Wyld
> Domains Product Team
> Tucows
> +1.416 535 0123 Ext. 1392
>  
>  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/irt.regdatapolicy/attachments/20200108/aca4e345/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/irt.regdatapolicy/attachments/20200108/aca4e345/signature.asc>