[IRT.RegDataPolicy] [Ext] Re: Review Implementation Methods

Tue Jan 14 01:41:32 UTC 2020

Thanks Sarah.

This could work
I can’t promise how fast we can update this but at least we can get started.
We can adjust as we go to make it work for all of us.

We added your sheet in the IRT workbook.
It’s now the 4th sheet.
It’s labeled “imp method & timing tracking” after the Timeline sheet.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1r8yMMEFIFS-KHGMsnLdVbdn0O_GWhf7vNLlNIZYP47U/edit#gid=1061558068

Thank CPH Team!

Dennis Chang

From: "IRT.RegDataPolicy" <irt.regdatapolicy-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Sarah Wyld <swyld at tucows.com>
Organization: Tucows
Date: Monday, January 13, 2020 at 08:50
To: "irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org" <irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] [Ext] Re: Review Implementation Methods

Hi all,

Thanks Dennis for this clarification.

The CPH team has put together this template to help track the implementation method, timelines, and other important info for each of the Phase 1 Recommendations.:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IIi34MnPbGcCsoqViGDUPv8G2C7uXTqMq2v4ZnvReLs/edit#gid=0

Would it be possible for the IPT to fill in this template so that the IRT members can keep track of the status, timing, and next steps for each rec? (I've already done Column C). This would resolve our request in the email thread "Question re non-OneDoc recs" as well.

Thanks,

--

Sarah Wyld

Domains Product Team

Tucows

+1.416 535 0123 Ext. 1392

On 1/10/2020 4:54 PM, Dennis Chang wrote:
Hi Beth,

Task #79 is to ensure the IRT understand that  there are two ways to go about implementing a recommendation we all agree on.
I am providing a chart for you as I noted, there was not clear understanding on the difference between what and how.

As I’ve changed my approach (not content) on how we will implement, I wanted the IRT to be on the same page as I talk about Method 1 vs Method 2.
I’ll go over this next week so if it’s confusing now, please just know that there are two ways to implement.

I believe the new way (Method 1) is what many IRT was advising me to do and I wanted to clearly communicate that there is a change to the approach from Method 2 which I originally proposed to Method 1 (the way I am proposing now.
81

Review revised implementation approach to Rec 23 URS UDRP<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C2X9kgKb4hKwz2JJr_OiLtmptfKSBaPRRSRPuIccUqc/edit>

20200113

Is an example.

If you agree with 81, then we are all good.
If not, my understanding is that there is a conflicting input from IRT and we’ll need to discuss.

FYI. I’ve got this on the agenda for next Wed.

Thanks
Dennis Chang

From: Elizabeth Bacon <beth at pir.org><mailto:beth at pir.org>
Date: Friday, January 10, 2020 at 13:12
To: Dennis Chang <dennis.chang at icann.org><mailto:dennis.chang at icann.org>, "irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org"<mailto:irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org> <irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org><mailto:irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] Re: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] Review Implementation Methods

Hi Dennis
Thanks so much for sharing the Implementation Methods.  For clarification, is this proposal is for how to note where other policies are impacted by the Final Report Recommendations (the Consensus Policy – OR- is it to identify which tasks require which implementation method?

It’s our understanding that in Montreal we already worked to identify which recs don’t require policy, so this work should have be complete. We also need to keep in mind other tasks to be completed outside of the Consensus Policy, such as a DPA.

Looking forward to discussing this on our call.
Thanks!
Beth

From: "IRT.RegDataPolicy" <irt.regdatapolicy-bounces at icann.org><mailto:irt.regdatapolicy-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Dennis Chang <dennis.chang at icann.org><mailto:dennis.chang at icann.org>
Date: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 at 10:29 AM
To: "irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org"<mailto:irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org> <irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org><mailto:irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org>
Subject: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] Review Implementation Methods

Dear IRT,

Here is the first assignment for the new year.
It’s an easy and fun one.

To facilitate the understanding of the different implementation methods, I’ve created for the team.
79

Review Implementation Methods [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_drawings_d_1LxsqBZ1SYucHM2KBDy0HLnqYBcNKkS9-2D32l1o1XYZCA_edit&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=dqLP1wJqBvDSYLKrSEaAkCi_Kv0Mk5D_d32n29DHCN8&m=v-opfB5bQ7-AMFZW6SP_YDxKGfsJY_9HLY5EZkjErfs&s=qA-Ikmg0zSNtOerOuEftE3bXctANUIgrS2liTcYW5s4&e=>

20200103

I’ll briefly touch on this today.
I believe it will help us in closing out these on the Task Determination.
23: URS/URDP [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1C2X9kgKb4hKwz2JJr-5FOiLtmptfKSBaPRRSRPuIccUqc_edit&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=dqLP1wJqBvDSYLKrSEaAkCi_Kv0Mk5D_d32n29DHCN8&m=v-opfB5bQ7-AMFZW6SP_YDxKGfsJY_9HLY5EZkjErfs&s=h1T9SBWpsKGAjKiPg66JH-K-_CPjRZA4XvyAI0WRw2E&e=>

24: Transfer Policy [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1FvGP-5Fm69nO4Pv6NcCONSs1hv6ZTp0o0iDqW8cNcPWso_edit&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=dqLP1wJqBvDSYLKrSEaAkCi_Kv0Mk5D_d32n29DHCN8&m=v-opfB5bQ7-AMFZW6SP_YDxKGfsJY_9HLY5EZkjErfs&s=oC9vxVZIddGoWytpGGpWscNiSlM9ziZ7S8OwaF4Sf0Q&e=>

And helpful in understanding the DocMap:
https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1UEF-R3R8fDXsffcNcz9fjtqApsuk2un0AlkC9Prxj0o/edit?folder=0AJcLhUsejJRYUk9PVA [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_drawings_d_1UEF-2DR3R8fDXsffcNcz9fjtqApsuk2un0AlkC9Prxj0o_edit-3Ffolder-3D0AJcLhUsejJRYUk9PVA&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=dqLP1wJqBvDSYLKrSEaAkCi_Kv0Mk5D_d32n29DHCN8&m=v-opfB5bQ7-AMFZW6SP_YDxKGfsJY_9HLY5EZkjErfs&s=PL2R99npqiVuikC4eFd0kHdZirzx7S-qFCFJcA3bb5k&e=>

--
Kind Regards,
Dennis S. Chang
GDD Programs Director
Phone: +1 213 293 7889
Sykpe: dennisSchang
www.icann.org [icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.icann.org&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=dqLP1wJqBvDSYLKrSEaAkCi_Kv0Mk5D_d32n29DHCN8&m=v-opfB5bQ7-AMFZW6SP_YDxKGfsJY_9HLY5EZkjErfs&s=8Mi8q7WgpixZqKPZ3QgrovhpHMTS05GwwnqAnLbOuqg&e=> One World – One Internet

_______________________________________________

IRT.RegDataPolicy mailing list

IRT.RegDataPolicy at icann.org<mailto:IRT.RegDataPolicy at icann.org>

https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/irt.regdatapolicy

_______________________________________________

By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/irt.regdatapolicy/attachments/20200114/10eea271/attachment.html>