[IRT.RegDataPolicy] R27 wave 1 draft report review

Tue Jan 14 22:25:20 UTC 2020

Sarah,

Thank you for your note.  On the suggestion, yes this makes sense and we will add the relevant bucket to each item in the analysis.

On the milestones, the annex to the report is the work plan for Rec 27 that we shared with the IRT in August and the dates shown there are not current.  As we are in the midst of wave 2, we can develop and share with the IRT an updated timeline for completing this work.

Best regards,
Karen

--

Karen Lentz
Senior Director, Policy Research & Data Services

ICANN
12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
Los Angeles CA  90094
+1 310 895 3637

From: "IRT.RegDataPolicy" <irt.regdatapolicy-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Sarah Wyld <swyld at tucows.com>
Organization: Tucows
Date: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 at 10:58 AM
To: "irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org" <irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] R27 wave 1 draft report review

Thanks Karen. I appreciated the chance to review this report draft.

To your specific questions, I do agree that these issues should be resolved within the GNSO, and I didn't notice anything missing (although I'm sure my review was not as comprehensive as your team's was!)

I do have a suggestion and a question :)

In the Analysis section, where each of the affected policies is listed, it'd be nice if you could add the bucket (high/medium/low) since the analysis section is in alphabetical rather than priority order.

In the timeline section, is the Milestones chart up to date?

Thanks,

--

Sarah Wyld

Domains Product Team

Tucows

+1.416 535 0123 Ext. 1392

On 1/13/2020 11:19 PM, Karen Lentz wrote:
Dear IRT members,

As background to this task, this is the draft report for Wave 1 of the EPDP Phase 1 recommendation 27, impacted policies and procedures.  Please note that this is in draft form and we are sharing with the IRT prior to delivering in official form to the GNSO.

The ask for the IRT is to review for:  1) Confirmation that the GNSO is the appropriate path for resolving these issues as they concern impacts on existing consensus policies, and 2) Identification of any impacted areas not specified in the draft.

Some summary points are below:

  *   The EPDP Ph 1 Recommendation 27 specified the need to identify and address all policies and procedures that might be affected by the EPDP Phase 1 policy recommendations and the new Registration Data Policy.
  *   ICANN org has performed a detailed review of a set of existing policies and procedures and has drafted this Wave 1 report, which provides an analysis of the impacted areas identified as well as potential changes to address the impact.
  *   Impacts may include outdated provision language, higher-level issues such as the relevance or inconsistency of an existing policy or procedure with the new Registration Data Policy, or implications for existing contractual provisions.
  *   It is important to note that this work will be completed in two waves, based on priority. A follow-up to this report (Wave 2) will cover the relevant (non-policy) procedures (e.g., Data Escrow, Trademark Clearinghouse).
  *   The Wave 1 draft report includes an analysis of the 15 policies or procedures listed below and identifies the level of impact of the policy recommendations, which can be put in rough buckets as follows:
High Impact

  *   Registry Registration Data Directory Services Consistent Labeling and Display Policy<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/rdds-labeling-policy-2017-02-01-en>
  *   Thick RDDS (Whois) Transition Policy for .COM, .NET and .JOBS<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/thick-whois-transition-policy-2017-02-01-en>
  *   Transfer Policy<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/transfers>
  *   Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy<https://www.icann.org/en/help/dndr/udrp> (UDRP) (Rules)
  *   Uniform Rapid Suspension<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/urs-2014-01-09-en> (URS)
Medium Impact

  *   Expired Domain Deletion Policy<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/accreditation/eddp> (EDDP)
  *   Whois Data Reminder Policy<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/consensus-policies/wdrp> (WDRP)
Low Impact

  *   AGP Limits Policy<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registries/agp/agp-policy-17dec08-en.htm>
  *   Additional Whois Information Policy<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/policy-awip-2014-07-02-en>(AGP)
  *   Expired Registration Recovery Policy<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/consensus-policies/errp>(ERRP)
  *   Protection of IGO and INGO Identifier in All gTLDs Policy<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/igo-ingo-protection-policy-2018-01-16-en>
  *   Registry Services Evaluation Policy<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registries/rsep/policy> (RSEP)
  *   Restored Names Accuracy Policy<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/consensus-policies/rnap> (RNAP)
  *   Revised ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/whois-privacy-conflicts-procedure-2008-01-17-en>
  *   Whois Marketing Restriction Policy<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/registrars/consensus-policies/wmrp-en>
Next steps:

  *   The impacts for the items described in the Wave 1 report appear to be within the remit of the GNSO, as they are either consensus policies or, in the case of URS, currently being considered in a GNSO policy development process.
  *   The draft report is being shared with the EPDP Phase 1 Implementation Review Team (IRT) currently working with ICANN org on implementation of the policy recommendations, for completeness and validation that the GNSO is the appropriate path for the items included in the report.
  *   Following this review step, the report, with any updates from the IRT review, will be submitted to the GNSO Council who will then determine next steps (e.g., Expedited Policy Development Process, GNSO Guidance Process, etc.).

We appreciate this recommendation on the part of the EPDP Team as it has been very instructive to undertake this exercise.  From a process perspective, this effort also suggests that the ICANN procedures for developing, approving, and implementing a new policy may lack a mechanism for transparently identifying and resolving any conflicts or impacts on existing policies and procedures where they apply.

We think this an important discussion for the community to undertake.  The Board is interested in furthering a discussion on this in the coming months, and will look forward to the engagement of the community in this dialogue as well.

Please let us know of any questions.

Best regards,
Karen

--

Karen Lentz
Senior Director, Policy Research & Data Services

ICANN
12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
Los Angeles CA  90094
+1 310 895 3637

From: "IRT.RegDataPolicy" <irt.regdatapolicy-bounces at icann.org><mailto:irt.regdatapolicy-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Dennis Chang <dennis.chang at icann.org><mailto:dennis.chang at icann.org>
Date: Monday, January 13, 2020 at 5:59 PM
To: "irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org"<mailto:irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org> <irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org><mailto:irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org>
Subject: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] R27 wave 1 draft report review

Dear IRT,

R27 draft report for Wave 1 is now ready for IRT review and added to the Task List as
84

Review R27 Wave 1 draft Report <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HM8V2IJwcNQdz_1amMITLcbw4hWO7zUuYKjDRG2OJYs/edit>

20200203

Karen,
Will follow this task assignment email with information regarding this report.

Stay tuned.

--
Kind Regards,
Dennis S. Chang
GDD Programs Director
Phone: +1 213 293 7889
Sykpe: dennisSchang
www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org> One World – One Internet

_______________________________________________

IRT.RegDataPolicy mailing list

IRT.RegDataPolicy at icann.org<mailto:IRT.RegDataPolicy at icann.org>

https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/irt.regdatapolicy

_______________________________________________

By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/irt.regdatapolicy/attachments/20200114/603e6771/attachment.html>