[IRT.RegDataPolicy] Wrong information in letter from Board to Council

[Rubens Kuhl]

A recent communication from ICANN Board to GNSO Council states:

"The Board understands there are diverging


views among some IRT members about how to implement EPDP Phase 1 Recommendation 7,"


This is simply not true. The IRT has clear instructions from IPT that since that recommendation was not adopted, it is not in scope of the discussions. So how something not in scope and that hasn't been discussed would have diverging views ? The record on this needs to be corrected ASAP.




Rubens

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/irt.regdatapolicy/attachments/20200311/bd412f80/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: page1image38948032.png
Type: image/png
Size: 387 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/irt.regdatapolicy/attachments/20200311/bd412f80/page1image38948032.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 528 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/irt.regdatapolicy/attachments/20200311/bd412f80/signature.asc>