[IRT.RegDataPolicy] Comparing redlines to approved Wave1 next steps plan

[Sarah Wyld]

Hello team,

I took a look at the Wave1/Rec27 next steps document (PDF) to review the direction that was approved by the GNSO Council and I note a discrepancy between that plan and our approach to some of these impacted policies. 

For example, for the UDRP Rules the “type of change required” column has 11 changes noted. The “possible next steps” column then says:

1. Request EPDP Phase 1 IRT or establish new IRT to address terminology updates
2-11 Request RPM Phase 2 to consider these items

This means that the change number 1 should be addressed by this IRT (or a new one could be established), while changes 2 – 11 should be sent to the RPM Phase 2 Working Group to handle.

In reviewing the UDRP redline, I see there are changes that fall into the 2-11 bucket. For example, change 6:

6. UDRP Rules section 3(b) describes the required elements for submission of a complaint under the UDRP. These include, in item (v), “the name of the Respondent (domain-name holder) and all information (including any postal and email addresses and telephone and telefax numbers) known to Complainant regarding how to contact Respondent or any representative of Respondent, including contact information based on pre-complaint dealings, in sufficient detail to allow the Provider to send the complaint as described in Paragraph 2(a).” Per the EPDP Team’s Phase 1 recommendation 23, this provision may be updated to clarify that a complaint will not be deemed administratively deficient for failure to provide the name of the Respondent and all other relevant contact information.

That change is represented in 3(v) of the redline doc, when it should instead have been sent back to the RPM WG. 

Can the IPT please confirm that we will follow the direction provided in the Wave 1 next steps doc which was approved in the August 20 GNSO Council meeting? 

Thank you,

-- 
Sarah Wyld, CIPP/E

Domains Product Team
Tucows
swyld at tucows.com 
+1.416 535 0123 Ext. 1392



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/irt.regdatapolicy/attachments/20201019/77e8e7fd/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 5D3D0A04EF504FEFAD2F7BDD46502AAD.png
Type: image/png
Size: 13868 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/irt.regdatapolicy/attachments/20201019/77e8e7fd/5D3D0A04EF504FEFAD2F7BDD46502AAD.png>