[IRT.RegDataPolicy] IRT Liaison report on Rec7 during the 20Aug2020 GNSO Council Meeting

[Rubens Kuhl]

> 
> I suppose there may be a Scenario Three where a legal basis exists in only some cases.   But either way this scenario would also kill the Thick WHOIS consensus policy.

If something killed Thick WHOIS consensus policy, it was GDPR, not Reg Data Policy. Reg Data Policy is trying to stay silent on this, so other efforts can determine whether GDPR inflicted a letal wound on Thick WHOIS or not.

That said, registries with registration restrictions are known cases whether Rr to Rr registrar are known to be legal since not transferring that information would cause a registration failure. What someone (not this IRT) will need to figure out is what happens in registries with no registration restrictions.



Rubens


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/irt.regdatapolicy/attachments/20200903/a1f39fa8/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 529 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/irt.regdatapolicy/attachments/20200903/a1f39fa8/signature.asc>