[IRT.RegDataPolicy] IRT Liaison to the GNSO Council

Theo Geurts gtheo at xs4all.nl
Mon Sep 14 06:31:33 UTC 2020


Good observation Roger.


Thanks

Theo



Op 14-9-2020 om 02:26 schreef Roger D Carney:
> Good Afternoon,
>
> Thanks for sending this Sebastien.
>
> I do not support presenting this to Council, as it is written, as it 
> may not resolve the issue. The only option this presents that will 
> resolve this conflict is if the Council decides that ePDP Phase 1 
> Recommendation 7 conflicts with the Thick WHOIS Policy, as this 
> determination is the only one that the entire IRT appear to agree on 
> what that means and what the expected outcome would be.
>
> I also believe that the wording "Mirroring the above" is completely 
> misleading as the outcome of the determination of "Council believes 
> there is no conflict" is completely different and is the exact issue 
> we are trying to resolve. In addition, I believe the use of 
> "recommendation" is completely inappropriate and misleading when 
> describing the outcome the IP/BC/IPT support if the Council believes 
> there is no conflict, "recommendation" is a direct reference to the 
> final report. The text of the "no conflict" outcome for the BC/IP/IPT 
> would need to be changed to something like "...the recommendation 
> language is not needed in the Policy..." or removed completely.
>
> If text similar to what you are proposing is to be presented to 
> Council, then it needs to be made clearer by explicitly calling out 
> that there are two outcome options for "no conflict":
>
>  1. The language from Recommendation 7 "/provided an appropriate legal
>     basis exists and data processing agreement is in place/" should be
>     included in the Policy and the Policy language suggested by CPH is
>     appropriate.
>  2. The language from Recommendation 7 "/provided an appropriate legal
>     basis exists and data processing agreement is in place/" is not
>     needed and the Policy language suggested by staff is appropriate.
>
>
>
> Thanks
> Roger
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* IRT.RegDataPolicy <irt.regdatapolicy-bounces at icann.org> on 
> behalf of Sebastien at registry.godaddy <Sebastien at registry.godaddy>
> *Sent:* Sunday, September 13, 2020 2:55 PM
> *To:* Ducos, Sebastien via IRT.RegDataPolicy <irt.regdatapolicy at icann.org>
> *Subject:* [IRT.RegDataPolicy] IRT Liaison to the GNSO Council
> Notice: This email is from an external sender.
>
> Dear IRT Members,
>
> Please find attached my report to the GNSO Council.
> This will be filed tomorrow to meet my deadline on document submission 
> for the next GNSO Meeting on 24 September.
>
> Please note that as per my suggestion on Friday, I based the report on 
> the earlier “Path Forward” document, removing any mention of my 
> earlier suggested path. I have left you a redline from that earlier 
> document.
>
> As per my 26 August email, having received no group-approved 
> instructions in writing, I am reporting in my own name on the 
> situation as I see it. In a continuous attempt to remain neutral, I 
> try representing the different views as I understand them, up until 
> the last exchanges on Friday.
>
> I will seek direction/suggestions from the Council on their views on 
> “if the Council believes there is no conflict between Rec 7 and the 
> Thick WHOIS Policy” and their understanding of the implications.
>
> Kindly,
>
>
>
> *Sebastien Ducos*
>
> GoDaddy Registry | Senior Client Services Manager
>
> signature_445988404
>
> +61449623491
>
> Level 8, 10 Queens Road
>
> Melbourne, VIC, Australia
>
> 3004
>
>
> sebastien at registry.godaddy <mailto:sebastien at registry.godaddy>
>
> www.linkedin.com/in/sebastienducos 
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sebastienducos>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRT.RegDataPolicy mailing list
> IRT.RegDataPolicy at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/irt.regdatapolicy
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/irt.regdatapolicy/attachments/20200914/c162b02c/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Outlook-signature_.png
Type: image/png
Size: 52021 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/irt.regdatapolicy/attachments/20200914/c162b02c/Outlook-signature_-0001.png>


More information about the IRT.RegDataPolicy mailing list