[ispcp] Note to ISOC members on the NTIA request for comments on the MoU

[Mark McFadden]

I'm drafting as we speak.

mark

maggie.mansourkia at verizon.com wrote:
> 
> No apologies necessary.  I totally agree.  Did we decide to file 
> comments together on behalf of the ISPCP?
> 
> Magnolia Mansourkia
> Chief Privacy Counsel
> Verizon Communications
> 703-351-3199 Voice
> 703-351-3653 Fax
> 202-744-3745 Mobile
> 
> 
> *Greg Ruth <greg_ruth at yahoo.com>*
> Sent by: owner-ispcp at gnso.icann.org
> 
> 07/05/2006 01:09 PM
> 
> 	
> To
> 	mcfadden at 21st-century-texts.com, ispcp at icann.org
> cc
> 	
> Subject
> 	Re: [ispcp] Note to ISOC members on the NTIA request for comments on 
> the MoU
> 
> 
> 	
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> All,
>     Does anyone else have a problem with the statement
> 
> "...operational authority over the DNS root name server
> system through formal arrangements with the root name server operators
> is not desirable. We believe that the current distributed and redundant
> way of operating the root name servers by a dozen independent
> organizations is highly successful."
> 
> I think this Blanche DuBois strategy (depending on the kindness of
> strangers) is rather ingenuous (or, perhaps, disingenuous).  It
> reflects the culture of the Internet about 20 years ago, when
> everything was done informally by "gentleman's agreement" (sorry
> Maggie).  Things have changed.  What's wrong with formal arrangements
> with the root name server operators?
> 
> Greg
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>