[ispcp] WG: [council] Decision on whether to initiate a PDP regarding vertical integration of registries & registrars

[jaime wagner]

Dear Wolf and All

 

I had three technology problems that prevented my communication with you
all:

 

1)      I lost access to jaime at cgi.br mail box. This is solved, but please
use jaime at corp.plugin.com.br instead.

 

2)      A new anti-spam tool was set up in plugin which filtered all e-mails
sent to or from gnso an ispcp groups. I recovered now over 400 e-mails from
gnso and ispcp that I had not received since Seoul. I’ll try to catch up
during the weekend.

 

3)      In Seoul my Iphone was blocked. It took two days to recover when I
came back to Brazil, but I lost all data that was input to the Iphone there,
including meeting schedules.

 

I’m very sorry for that.

 

Please Wolf if you can help me pointing the main issues that are at stake
and that require my immediate attention I would be very grateful.

 

Regards

 

Jaime Wagner

 

 

From: owner-ispcp at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-ispcp at gnso.icann.org] On
Behalf Of KnobenW at telekom.de
Sent: sexta-feira, 27 de novembro de 2009 06:31
To: ispcp at icann.org
Subject: [ispcp] WG: [council] Decision on whether to initiate a PDP
regarding vertical integration of registries & registrars

 

Dear colleagues,

 

I forward this message to you asking for comments on the question of urgency
of the subject. My personal opinion is that from an ISPCP point of view the
council should carefully discuss the item rather to decide on a PDP
initiation in a hurry. So if I don't get different opinion from your side by
Tuesday next week I'll Chuck inform accordingly

 

Thanks and have a nice weekend

Wolf-Ulrich 

 

 

 

  _____  

Von: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] Im
Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. November 2009 22:20
An: council at gnso.icann.org
Betreff: [council] Decision on whether to initiate a PDP regarding vertical
integration of registries & registrars

In anticipation of receiving the Vertical Separation of Registries and
Registrars Issues Report  the end of next week (4 Dec), the current Bylaws
require "the Council shall meet within fifteen (15) calendar days after
receipt of such Report to vote on whether to initiate the PDP."  That means
we need a motion (or motions) for our next meeting on 17 Dec.

 

It seems to me that for an issue like this that will be somewhat
complicated, making a decision on initiating a PDP within as little as 13
days of receiving the issues report may be challenging, and even more so
this time of year.  Also, we will not have finished our project
prioritization exercise by then.  On the other hand, to the extent that a
PDP could possibly result in delays of the introduction of new gTLDs, I
think we don't want to contribute to any more delays if avoidable.  

 

So I am requesting Councilors to express your opinions in this regard.
Should we consider deferring the PDP decision until January or should we
vote on whether to initiate a PDP in our 17 Dec meeting?  Note that we have
two meetings in January on the 7th and the 28th.  Your thoughts are
requested.

 

Chuck

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ispcp/attachments/20091128/dfd6e3ef/attachment.html>