[ispcp] Fwd: [gnso-iocrc-dt] *** FOR IMMEDIATE COMMENT: OPTION 7 v. 2 WITH FREEZE ON LANGUAGE***

Anthony Harris harris at cabase.org.ar
Tue Feb 28 13:31:40 UTC 2012


Dear Osvaldo,

This text seems OK to me, and in line with the
provisions contained in the DAG for new gTLDs.

Best regards

Tony Harris


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Novoa, Osvaldo" <onovoa at antel.com.uy>
To: <ispcp at icann.org>
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 2:15 PM
Subject: [ispcp] Fwd: [gnso-iocrc-dt] *** FOR IMMEDIATE COMMENT: OPTION 7 v. 
2 WITH FREEZE ON LANGUAGE***


>
> Dejar All,
> This would be the final version of the option recommended by the drafting 
> team on the IOC/RC reserved names.
> I would appreciate your comments.
> Best regards,
> Osvaldo Novoa
>
> Enviado desde mi iPhone
>
> Inicio del mensaje reenviado:
>
> De: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman at neustar.us<mailto:Jeff.Neuman at neustar.us>>
> Fecha: 25 de febrero de 2012 00:26:10 GMT-02:00
> Para: <gnso-iocrc-dt at icann.org<mailto:gnso-iocrc-dt at icann.org>>
> Asunto: [gnso-iocrc-dt] *** FOR IMMEDIATE COMMENT:  OPTION 7 v. 2 WITH 
> FREEZE ON LANGUAGE***
>
> All,
>
> In line with Steve’s suggestion, I am freezing the language on Option 7 as 
> is with the suggested changes from Lanre and Greg.  We could probably word 
> smith this forever. Please consider this the final version for seeking 
> input and for raising during the call with the GAC next week. In the 
> meantime, in addition to the status report, I will begin to draft the 
> straw man of options for the second level.
>
> *******************************************************************
>
> Option 7:  Treat the terms set forth in Section 2.2.1.2.3 as “Modified 
> Reserved Names,� meaning:
>
> a)      The Modified Reserved Names are available as gTLD strings to the 
> International Olympic Committee (hereafter the “IOC�), International Red 
> Cross and Red Crescent Movement (hereafter “RCRC") and their respective 
> components as applicable.
>
> b)      Applied-for gTLD strings, other than those applied for by the IOC 
> or RCRC, are reviewed during the String Similarity review to determine 
> whether they are similar to these Modified Reserved Names. An application 
> for a gTLD string that is identified as too similar to a Modified Reserved 
> Name will not pass this initial review.
>
>
> c)      If an application fails to pass initial string similarity review:
>
>
>                                i.            And the applied-for TLD 
> identically matches any of the Modified Reserved Names (e.g., ".Olympic" 
> or ".RedCross"), it cannot be registered by anyone other than the IOC or 
> the RCRC, as applicable.
>
>                              ii.            If the applied-for TLD is not 
> identical to any of the Modified Reserved Names, but fails initial string 
> similarity review with one of Modified Reserved Names, the applicant may 
> attempt to override the string similarity failure by:
>
>
> 1.      Seeking a letter of non-objection from the IOC or the RCRC, as 
> applicable; or
>
> 2.      If it cannot obtain a letter of non-objection, the applicant must:
>
> a.       claim to have a legitimate interest in the string, and 
> demonstrate the basis for this claim; and
> b.      explain why it believes that the new TLD is not confusingly 
> similar to one of the protected strings and makes evident that it does not 
> refer to the IOC, RCRC or any Olympic or Red Cross Red Crescent activity.
>
> 3.      A determination in favor of the applicant under the above 
> provision (ii)(2) above would not preclude the IOC, RCRC or other 
> interested parties from bringing a legal rights objection or otherwise 
> contesting the determination.
>
> 4.      The existence of a TLD that has received a letter of non-objection 
> by the IOC or RCRC pursuant to (ii)(1), or has been approved pursuant to 
> (ii)(2) shall not preclude the IOC or RCRC from obtaining one of the 
> applicable Modified Reserved Names in any round of new gTLD applications.
>
>
> Jeffrey J. Neuman
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
> 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling, VA 20166
> Office: +1.571.434.5772  Mobile: +1.202.549.5079  Fax: +1.703.738.7965 / 
> jeff.neuman at neustar.biz<mailto:jeff.neuman at neustar.biz>  / 
> www.neustar.biz<http://www.neustar.biz/>
> ________________________________
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the 
> use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or 
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have 
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, 
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you 
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately 
> and delete the original message.
>
>
> ________________________________
> El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto est� dirigido 
> �nicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene informaci�n que puede 
> ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor 
> notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine 
> inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su 
> sistema. Est� prohibida cualquier utilizaci�n, difusi�n o copia de este 
> e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las espec�ficas 
> destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con 
> respecto a cualquier comunicaci�n que haya sido emitida incumpliendo 
> nuestra Pol�tica de Seguridad de la Informaci�n
>
>
> This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for 
> the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the 
> sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the 
> attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person 
> or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is 
> not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our 
> Information Security Policy.
> 




More information about the ispcp mailing list