[ispcp] Inpact of new gTLDS -- with an attachment this time, sorry

[Mike O'Connor]

i have also made some very small changes (i added them to Akinori's draft to keep them all together).

i agree wholeheartedly with the approach -- i added SSR to the pile of items within the scope of the new/proposed cross-cutting activities.

mikey


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Initial imput on the Impact of new gTLDs on ICANN and its structure - MO.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 33280 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ispcp/attachments/20120918/2b9124ac/InitialimputontheImpactofnewgTLDsonICANNanditsstructure-MO.doc>
-------------- next part --------------


On Sep 18, 2012, at 12:32 PM, MAEMURA Akinori <maem at nic.ad.jp> wrote:

> Dear Tony,
> 
> The attachment is to fix tiny points.  Please integrate them if you agree.
> 
> I read it with a fresh eye without involvement to the previous discussion.
> 
> I agree that new comers with the new gTLD which is now introduing 1200+ TLDs will completely change the landscape of GNSO composition as written.
> 
> I like the approach to try a different Stakeholder Advisory mechanism from the agenda which are more general to ICANN.
> 
> 
> I found some other issues are raised there: overload of GNSO Council, difficulty with joint SO/AC WG activities and the paper seems to propose a way to improve them all at once.
> 
> I had a feeling by it as if the ISPCP propose a process change to include other SO and ACs into the development of the gTLD policies.
> 
> For me, it should have been much easier to read if the different stakeholder advisory mechanism had been within GNSO.
> 
> 
> I am afraid that I just tell you my impression without any solution.
> I might have missed any discussion, so it would be great if you find any gap of logic within this paper in my impression.
> 
> 
> Sincerely,
> Akinori
> 
> 
> In message <00c301cd95a0$bbea68a0$33bf39e0$@btinternet.com>
>  "[ispcp] FW: Inpact of new gTLDS"
>  ""tony holmes" <tonyarholmes at btinternet.com>" wrote:
> 
> | All
> | 
> | Attached is an overdue draft of the ISPCP response on the impact of the new
> | gTLD program. It aligns with the thoughts we discussed in Prague. Apologies
> | for the delay in sending this, but we do need to get it to the Board
> | Governance Committee ASAP.
> | 
> | I'd very much appreciate your comments or concurrence ASAP, ideally by this
> | time tomorrow if at all possible. 
> | 
> | Best Regards
> | 
> | Tony
> | 
> | 
> | 
> | 
> | 
> | 
> | 
> <Initial imput on the Impact of new gTLDs on ICANN and its structure - AM.docx>

- - - - - - - - -
phone 	651-647-6109  
fax  		866-280-2356  
web 	http://www.haven2.com
handle	OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)