[ispcp] Impact of new gTLD program

[tony holmes]

All 

Many thanks for your quick response on the draft. The attached version
should contain all proposed changes. Please let me know promptly if I've
missed anything, I intend to send the final version to ICANN today.

 

Akinori - in answer to the issue you raised; if the proposed Stakeholder
Advisory Platform remained within the GNSO it wouldn't solve the problem as
each group would still discuss common issues within their own domain before
broader discussion occurred. Neither would that reduce the load on the
existing policy development groups. I hope that answers your question.

 

Regards

 

Tony

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ispcp/attachments/20120919/0079564a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ISPCP Initial input on the Impact of new gTLDs on ICANN and its structure.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 47616 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ispcp/attachments/20120919/0079564a/ISPCPInitialinputontheImpactofnewgTLDsonICANNanditsstructure.doc>