[ispcp] Fwd: [council] Proposed Motion on RAA

[Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de]

FYI

Wolf-Ulrich

Sent from my personal phone

Anfang der weitergeleiteten E‑Mail:

> Von: Wendy Seltzer <wendy at seltzer.com>
> Datum: 3. April 2013 08:27:43 GMT+08:00
> An: Council GNSO <council at gnso.icann.org>
> Betreff: [council] Proposed Motion on RAA
> 
> 
> I'd like to propose the following motion for the Beijing meeting
> (resending from the correct address):
> 
> Whereas the most recently posted draft Registrar Accreditation Agreement
> (RAA) has raised serious concerns of policy among most of the
> stakeholder groups in the GNSO [see Minutes of March call];
> 
> Whereas ICANN negotiators have held it out as a blocker to the
> implementation of the New gTLD Program;
> 
> Resolved, Council recommends that ICANN permit Registrars to extend the
> rights and obligations in the current RAA and its renewals to new gTLDs
> until such time as the GNSO adopts a consensus supporting the policy
> changes in any proposed new RAA.
> 
> Thanks,
> --Wendy
> 
> -- 
> Wendy Seltzer -- wendy at seltzer.org +1 617.863.0613
> Policy Counsel, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
> Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
> Visiting Fellow, Yale Law School Information Society Project
> http://wendy.seltzer.org/
> https://www.chillingeffects.org/
> https://www.torproject.org/
> http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ispcp/attachments/20130403/aac553bc/attachment.html>