[ispcp] Fwd: [council] Draft Operational Design Phase for gTLD Policy Implementation: For Initial Feedback.

Thu Oct 8 08:14:55 UTC 2020

Thanks Wolf-Ulrich, 

As input to our discussion, please note the elements provided by Mary after yesterday's working session. 

I also understand from the answer provided by staff during that session that this framework, although not yet formalized, will be put in place as soon as the preparation for the board's vote on EPDP phase 2 recommendations. 

I think there's some recognition that this may be helpful but also some concerns relative to this adding an extra layer of complexity or on the risks of seeing this operational design phase address policy items that may have been overlooked by the PDP WG.

Regards,
Philippe 

-----Original Message-----
From: ispcp [mailto:ispcp-bounces at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of wuknoben at gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2020 12:14 AM
To: 'Novoa, Osvaldo'; ispcp at gnso.icann.org
Subject: Re: [ispcp] Fwd: [council] Draft Operational Design Phase for gTLD Policy Implementation: For Initial Feedback.

Thanks Osvaldo and Philippe!

Some observations: I recognize the necessity for the Board  to have a complete picture of the impact of recommendations (cost, personal ressources etc.). The proposal adds another process (Design Phase) and working body (Design Feedback Group, DFG) to the existing ones which would build additional working load on the community. The work anyway is staff's obligation, not the community's one.
How could this effort be minimized? 

The alternative option, described beginning on page 7, seems to be a possible solution and could be investigated a bit more in detail (engagement of the PDP-WG). Maybe this way the PDP-WG could cover the tasks of the DFG which otherwise would need a specific election process within the GNSO.

Just some thoughts for your council debates.

Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: ispcp <ispcp-bounces at gnso.icann.org> Im Auftrag von Novoa, Osvaldo
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Oktober 2020 02:07
An: ispcp at gnso.icann.org
Betreff: [ispcp] Fwd: [council] Draft Operational Design Phase for gTLD Policy Implementation: For Initial Feedback.

Hello all,
Please see the attached mail, I would appreciate your comments.
Best regards,
Osvaldo

Enviado desde mi iPhone

Inicio del mensaje reenviado:

De: "Drazek, Keith via council" <council at gnso.icann.org>
Fecha: 5 de octubre de 2020, 18:35:06 UYT
Para: "council at gnso.icann.org" <council at gnso.icann.org>
Cc: "stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca" <stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca>, "aheineman at godaddy.com" <aheineman at godaddy.com>, "bruna.mrtns at gmail.com" <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>, "wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de" <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>, "claudia.selli at intl.att.com" <claudia.selli at intl.att.com>
Asunto: Re:  [council] Draft Operational Design Phase for gTLD Policy Implementation: For Initial Feedback.
Responder a: "Drazek, Keith" <kdrazek at verisign.com>

Hi all,

During the 23 September SO/AC Leaders call with Goran, Maarten and Leon, the concept of an “Operational Design Phase” was introduced by Goran. We had a preliminary discussion on the topic and Goran indicated that ICANN would produce a paper for community consideration and feedback. That paper is attached here for your review, and Goran’s email to the SO/AC Leaders is below. I’ll highlight 3 points from Goran’s note and from the discussion on the call:

  *   The objective for the design phase is to better prepare the Board by providing operational and resourcing information before making decisions on GNSO-approved policy recommendations.
  *   While the GNSO Council is the manager of the PDP and gTLD policy development is within the GNSO's remit, consensus policy making involves all stakeholders (including ACs who give advice to the Board).
  *   This design phase concept doesn't affect policy development or the CPIF. It recognizes that if policy issues are impacted, they rightfully go back to the GNSO for its consideration, rather than permitting ICANN Org or Board to make unilateral changes. (I made this point during the call)

Please review the attached paper and work within your SGs and Cs to develop feedback. Also, Karen Lentz will touch on this during our Tuesday Council Working Session.

To Goran’s last point about conducting a “fuller consultation on the gTLD policy lifecycle,” we’ll need to ensure that the GNSO Council and our SGs and Cs are prepared to engage where appropriate and in light of our ongoing PDP 3.0 work and the upcoming GNSO Review.

Thanks and regards,

Keith

From: soac-chairs <soac-chairs-bounces at icann.org<mailto:soac-chairs-bounces at icann.org>> On Behalf Of Goran Marby
Sent: Friday, October 2, 2020 3:19 PM
To: soac-chairs at icann.org<mailto:soac-chairs at icann.org>
Cc: Goran Marby <goran.marby at icann.org<mailto:goran.marby at icann.org>>; David Olive <david.olive at icann.org<mailto:david.olive at icann.org>>; Cassia Oliveira <cassia.oliveira at icann.org<mailto:cassia.oliveira at icann.org>>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [soac-chairs] Draft Operational Design Phase for gTLD Policy Implementation: For Initial Feedback.

Cassia Oliveira on behalf of Goran Marby

Dear SOAC leaders,

Thank you again for taking the time to meet with Maarten and me last week. I am writing to follow up on one of ICANN org’s action items from that call, which was for me to finalize and circulate to you a proposal for a new Operational Design Phase relating to the implementation of approved gTLD policies. As we discussed, the objective for an additional design phase is to allow the Board to obtain relevant information about any operational and resourcing issues associated with certain policy implementation efforts. Accordingly, the Operational Design Phase is envisioned to take place prior to Board action on GNSO-approved policy recommendations, initiated through a Board request to ICANN org. Our expectation is that an Operational Design Phase will likely only be needed for complex, costly or other large-scale implementation efforts.

I appreciate the thoughtful and substantive discussion we had on this topic during our call. While gTLD policy development work is managed by the GNSO, the other Supporting Organizations and the Advisory Committees play important roles in ensuring that ICANN consensus policies are developed through community consensus and are appropriately resourced. Thank you for the comments and suggestions you made on the call, which we have tried to address as much as possible in this initial draft paper.

Please circulate the paper to your community groups for their review and further discussion. As I mentioned on our call, ICANN org will continue to refine the paper and welcome your feedback as part of this iterative process. After ICANN69, we plan to conduct a fuller community consultation on the gTLD policy lifecycle, to include an updated version of this paper and to gather community feedback on any updates we can make to improve the efficacy and efficiency of the policy making process.

Best regards,

Göran  Marby
President & CEO ICANN
+1(310) 578 8690

Cássia Oliveira
Sr. Manager, Office of the President & CEO cassia.oliveira at icann.org<mailto:cassia.oliveira at icann.org>
+1(310) 578 8656

________________________________

El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información

This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.

_______________________________________________
ispcp mailing list
ispcp at gnso.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ispcp

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [council] Draft Operational Design Phase for gTLD Policy Implementation: For Initial Feedback.
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 16:47:29 +0000
Size: 48235
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ispcp/attachments/20201008/69f5d565/attachment-0001.mht>