[NCAP-Discuss] Draft final Study 1 report: "re-registered name collisions"

[Rubens Kuhl]

> On 30 Apr 2020, at 14:14, Danny McPherson <danny at tcb.net> wrote:
> 
> On 2020-04-30 13:10, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
> 
>> Not to argue about the study scope, to which Matt already answered,
>> it's of note that in SubPro PDP, re-registrations were also in scope
>> of name collisions, and were called in the WG charter as collisions in
>> current gTLDs. So this is definitely not unprecedented.
> 
> 
> Why?  Where is the collision occurring - the same globally unique name in the same global RZM namespace is not a collision by their very own definition.


That's a question that could have been raised between June 2014 and October 2015, when there was a community discussion group flagging the issues that were later studied by the PDP WG that started in 2016 and hasn't finished yet. The fact is that it was included both in the issues matrix output of the discussion group and in the 2016 WG charter, so this consolidated approach seem natural to a number of people, not only to the study 1 author.


Rubens

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 529 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ncap-discuss/attachments/20200430/625c1832/signature.asc>