[NCAP-Discuss] Revised draft of NCAP Study 1 report

[Thomas, Matthew]

Thank you for sending the latest draft.  After reviewing the document, I had a few thoughts specifically around sections 4 and 5.

Is there a correlation between the number of collisions and the size of the TLD and/or the number of domains on the TLD’s block list?
What kind of analysis should be undertaken to understand the relationship between these collision reports and pre-delegation telemetry (i.e. DITL) that can be useful for future risk assessment frameworks?
Is 180 days of CI more appropriate to capture the long tail based on the ICANN data?
What types of TLDs are associated with corporate versus home/personal collisions?
Can ICANN release the collision reports to the broader community for analysis (Section 5 states this could be provided for the authors of Studies 2 and 3 as needed and appropriate)?

Best,
Matt Thomas


On 1/28/20, 6:41 PM, "NCAP-Discuss on behalf of Matt Larson" <ncap-discuss-bounces at icann.org on behalf of matt.larson at icann.org> wrote:

    Dear colleagues,
    
    Attached is a revised draft of the Study 1 report. This version now includes sections four and five and is therefore complete, and Karen believes she has addressed the feedback received to date from the DG. Please note track changes are enabled so changes are clearly marked.
    
    To stay on schedule, we are tentatively planning to begin an ICANN public comment on the report on February 10. Please let us know if you have any comments so they can be addressed in another version of the document, if necessary, before the public comment.
    
    Thanks,
    
    Matt
    --
    Matt Larson, VP of Research
    ICANN Office of the CTO