[NCAP-Discuss] Revised draft of NCAP Study 1 report

[Danny McPherson]

> On Feb 5, 2020, at 2:56 PM, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at nic.br> wrote:
> 
> Actually, the 2012 data suggests that 60 days would be enough.

Can you provide a pointer to that analysis?


>> Can ICANN release the collision reports to the broader community for analysis (Section 5 states this could be provided for the authors of Studies 2 and 3 as needed and appropriate)?
> 
> I would see that as violating the confidentiality that people expected when referring cases to ICANN. But if consent was obtained from each and every complainant, that would be different.

I’m sure there are some useful observations and abstractions here that would be worthwhile.

-danny 

> 
> 
> Rubens
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NCAP-Discuss mailing list
> NCAP-Discuss at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ncap-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.