[NCAP-Discuss] [Ext] RE: Top-level Domains for Private Internets IETF draft

[Jeff Neuman]

Last response on this, I promise….

I have submitted the draft to the Subsequent Procedures PDP Working Group to discuss.

Thanks all for engaging in this subject.

Jeff Neuman
Senior Vice President
Com Laude | Valideus
D: +1.703.635.7514
E: jeff.neuman at comlaude.com<mailto:jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>

From: David Conrad <david.conrad at icann.org>
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 3:13 PM
To: Jeff Neuman <jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>
Cc: ncap-discuss at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Ext] RE: [NCAP-Discuss] Top-level Domains for Private Internets IETF draft

Jeff,

On Jun 15, 2020, at 10:33 AM, Jeff Neuman <jeff.neuman at comlaude.com<mailto:jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>> wrote:

But what about in the future if someone in the IETF want to create a special use domain for IOT or what about a string that corresponds with a brand?

Hence the proposal to use a set of strings that, because they are specified by the recognized authority (ISO-3166/MA) as assigned for user defined use, are not delegatable in the DNS according to existing policy. This is in contrast to pretty much any other string as there is (AFAIK) no policy that says those (non-ISO-3166) strings can’t be used in some future new gTLD round.


The only thing I am objecting to, to the extent I am even objecting, is that there seems to be some resistance to multi-organizational collaboration.

There is no resistance that I’m aware of (at least on the part of Roy, Ed, or myself).  I’m unclear why you would interpret a document being published as an Internet Draft in the IETF as an attempt to “circumvent” the multistakeholder process. I’ve asked in a previous message: where/how would you propose Roy and Ed publish their idea?


Anyway, I think the main point is to encourage cross organizational discussions.

Looks like there is indeed a lively discussion: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop, archives at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/ (which I’d probably recommend reviewing before jumping into the fray).

Regards,
-drc

________________________________
The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient. They may not be disclosed, used by or copied in any way by anyone other than the intended recipient. If you have received this message in error, please return it to the sender (deleting the body of the email and attachments in your reply) and immediately and permanently delete it. Please note that the Com Laude Group does not accept any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan or otherwise check this email and any attachments. The Com Laude Group does not accept liability for statements which are clearly the sender's own and not made on behalf of the group or one of its member entities. The Com Laude Group includes Nom-IQ Limited t/a Com Laude, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 5047655 and registered office at 28-30 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN England; Valideus Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 06181291 and registered office at 28-30 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN England; Demys Limited, a company registered in Scotland with company number SC197176, having its registered office at 33 Melville Street, Edinburgh, Lothian, EH3 7JF Scotland; Consonum, Inc. dba Com Laude USA and Valideus USA, headquartered at 1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600, McLean, VA 22102, USA; Com Laude (Japan) Corporation, a company registered in Japan having its registered office at Suite 319,1-3-21 Shinkawa, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0033, Japan. For further information see www.comlaude.com<https://comlaude.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ncap-discuss/attachments/20200615/e379381b/attachment-0001.html>