[NCAP-Discuss] Comment deadline extended (was Re: Draft final Study 1 report)

[Rubens Kuhl]

> On 6 May 2020, at 15:51, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrc.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Jeff.  In general, I would be concerned about OLD data versus CURRENT data.


Some times OLD is better in this theme. For instance, DNS captures from before QNAME minimisation became prevalent had more information on second-levels associated with a possible TLD than current captures.
So, the value of data needs to be taken at its real value, which is not just a function of time.


Rubens

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ncap-discuss/attachments/20200506/13987841/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 529 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ncap-discuss/attachments/20200506/13987841/signature.asc>