[NCAP-Discuss] Additional comments on the comments to the Scarfone Draft

[Aikman-Scalese, Anne]

Rubens - re the conclusion that "nothing surfaced", were you expecting consumer complaints related to MiTM issues to be reported to ICANN?

The intersection of name collision risk and DNS Abuse is a topic that needs to be addressed, especially given how hard it is now to find scammers.
Anne

-----Original Message-----
From: NCAP-Discuss <ncap-discuss-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of Rubens Kuhl
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2020 1:40 PM
To: NCAP Discussion Group <ncap-discuss at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [NCAP-Discuss] Additional comments on the comments to the Scarfone Draft



> On 6 May 2020, at 17:10, Danny McPherson <danny at tcb.net> wrote:
>
> On 2020-05-06 16:07, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>>> Further, the most virulent types of attacks are never going to be reported.
>> This is a boogeyman type of argument that contradicts the other
>> requests for evidence.
>
> Rubens,
> I'm talking about MiTM attacks exploiting collisions.  Victim's don't know they're happening - if you know where attackers are reporting them let me know please....
>


Attackers don't do MiTM attacks just for proof of concept; they go ahead and actually do something like stealing money or information. Of those episodes, some would have noticed the crime, reported it to authorities, which then would trigger investigations and at same point people would know that it happened.

And yet, years after the delegations, nothing surfaced.


Rubens





________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.