[NCAP-Discuss] NCAP DG Agenda: 12 of January

[Aikman-Scalese, Anne]

Hi all,
Re Agenda Item # 5, thanks for adding further discussion about this question to the meeting agenda for next week.

I do think that Warren’s suggestion at the end of our Zoom call today makes sense – in other words, if we are recommending a risk analysis system be implemented by ICANN, perhaps it would make sense to test the exact process we will be recommending against known problematic strings from the 2012 round, in particular those where there are applications which have not been withdrawn.  (I think based on Sub Pro policy work, these applications that have not been withdrawn would be given priority in the next round.)

I think there are at least two of these strings involved, i.e. .home and .mail.  I know that Jim has stated more than once that the DG will not be making recommendations as to particular strings (although the Board questions may be calling for responses like that in some cases).  It does seem that based on the Board’s specific questions to the SSAC re .corp, .home, and .mail, it would make sense to know how the process we are recommending in the slides previously presented by Jim and Matt might apply to the name collision risk analysis of those strings.  Perhaps if we apply that process as a Discussion Group, these may serve as examples to the Board as to how the risk analysis can be conducted by an internal ICANN.org Technical Review Committee going forward?  So we would be saying, here’s he process and here are a couple of examples we are putting through that process.

Anne

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese

Of Counsel



AAikman at lewisroca.com<mailto:AAikman at lewisroca.com>

D. 520.629.4428

[cid:image003.png at 01D807B5.EF869800]



From: NCAP-Discuss <ncap-discuss-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of Corina Ferrer
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2022 10:17 AM
To: ncap-discuss at icann.org
Subject: [NCAP-Discuss] NCAP DG Agenda: 12 of January

[EXTERNAL]
________________________________
Dear NCAP DG members,

Hope you had a nice holiday season and New Year!

Here is the agenda for the next meeting, Wednesday 12 January @ 11:00 PST.


  1.  Welcome and roll call
  2.  Update from the Technical Investigator – Casey
  3.  Current status of the NCAP project – Jennifer
  4.  Discuss feedback and finalize the draft Data Sensitivity Analysis<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sLPrBn8T6ym7gumySHeWG9THSGSRoEeKldv3uRMMy6Y/edit#heading=h.xv8v542ztejv> – Matt Thomas
     *   Decision required: Data sensitivity analysis and case studies ready to be published for Public Comment – scheduled for posting 19 January
  5.  Anne’s question per 15 December email<https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ncap-discuss/2021-December/000662.html>: “Is it possible that the DG should be recommending that ICANN test the system of controlled interruption we are endorsing on strings that were previously applied-for in 2012 and not delegated due to Name Collision issues?” (time permitting or push to next week?)
  6.  AOB

     *   Reminder – volunteers wanted for the NCAP DG ‘design team’
  1.  Confirm action items and decisions reached – Jennifer

A special thanks to Jennifer for assistance!

Regards,

Corina

________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ncap-discuss/attachments/20220112/b92f4fee/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2031 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ncap-discuss/attachments/20220112/b92f4fee/image003-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 209 bytes
Desc: image004.png
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ncap-discuss/attachments/20220112/b92f4fee/image004-0001.png>