[NCAP-Discuss] The Public Suffix List (PSL)

Jothan Frakes jothan at jothan.com
Mon Nov 13 04:41:02 UTC 2023


I think this will bounce to the list, bit the one hole I found when
thinking through the process of adding these, is that revocation (removal)
will need a process also.

The dent in all this is the propogation delay - both for additions and
removals.

I go into the challenge in describing propagation challenges in the wiki
https://github.com/publicsuffix/list/wiki/Guidelines#derivative-propagation-timing

We would also need to update the PSL wiki add some wording to the
description of whats going on related to the NCAP additions in this page
https://github.com/publicsuffix/list/wiki/Security-Considerations#the-public-suffix-list-adheres-to-icp-3-and-iab-guidance
as we would be introducing what might be perceived as an exception to the
adherence to ICP-3 to add stuff.



On Sun, Nov 12, 2023, 6:03 PM Rod Rasmussen <rod at rodrasmussen.com> wrote:

> Thanks Jeff,
>
> And knowing a thing or two about how Jothan and the PSL like to work,
> pre-notification actually fits in the model, so wouldn’t even be a
> “stretch”.  I concur with your analysis and conclusions.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Rod
>
> On Nov 9, 2023, at 11:09 AM, Jeff Schmidt via NCAP-Discuss <
> ncap-discuss at icann.org> wrote:
>
> Team:
>
> Rolling-up and sharing a number of conversations recently:
>
> The Public Suffix List (PSL) (https://publicsuffix.org/) is a
> volunteer-maintained list of TLDs and “TLD-like” domains like .com.cc, .
> co.uk, etc. PSL is lovingly maintained by Jothan and a small group of
> folks for quite a while now. The uses of PSL vary widely. There are several
> other similar projects that effectively maintain lists of TLD-like things
> for one reason or another.
>
> I believe it is a Finding for NCAP that such projects exist and have lose
> and widely varying relationships with the collisions phenomenon.
>
> PSL typically populates itself in one of two ways: (1) Observing IANA
> actions; and (2) Voluntary submissions. In the case of new gtlds, absent
> advance notification from ICANN/TRT, PSL would find out about the TLD at
> the time of an IANA action (the first trial delegation by the TRT). I think
> there is only one NCAP consideration beyond the Finding – should ICANN/TRT
> “pre-advise” PSL (causing PSL publication prior to IANA action), or simply
> remain silent and allow PSL to pick it up in normal course?
>
> Like everything Collisions, there is no clear choice and arguments could
> be made either way. Issues related to end software updates against PSL
> snapshots and the associated time lags are both unknowable and fortunately
> out of our remit.
> Going back to first principals, we want to:
> (1) Not hurt anything (beyond the intentionally designed notification
> interruptions)
> (2) Notify those potentially impacted
> (3) Collect data
> While I don’t know precisely all the ways folks use PSL, I can imagine the
> scenario we’re most interested in is software that analyzes a domain name
> looking thing to determine if it should use DNS to resolve it or do
> “something else” with it (perhaps like sending it to search or another
> resolution mechanism). Given that, since all our assumptions and processes
> are predicated on the potentially colliding strings being queried in the
> DNS, I think we should pre-advise the PSL as soon as practical and leave it
> at that.
>
> Thx,
> Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> NCAP-Discuss mailing list
> NCAP-Discuss at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ncap-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCAP-Discuss mailing list
> NCAP-Discuss at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ncap-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ncap-discuss/attachments/20231112/be289b46/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the NCAP-Discuss mailing list